EN PL
REVIEW PAPER
How compare biologics applied for rheumatic disorders?
 
More details
Hide details
 
Submission date: 2013-09-20
 
 
Final revision date: 2014-04-27
 
 
Acceptance date: 2014-04-30
 
 
Online publication date: 2014-06-04
 
 
Publication date: 2014-04-30
 
 
Reumatologia 2014;52(2):112-119
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis remains a major clinical problem but introduction of biologics significantly improved therapeutical strategy. Biologics reduce inflammation and its sequelae, including structural joint damage. Single direct comparative trials of biologics are only available, and indirect comparison methods are applied for evaluation of the biologics. Obtained results are not conclusive and are limited by several factors. Metaanalyses and indirect treatment comparison studies of biologic used for management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis are reviewed.
REFERENCES (18)
1.
Scott DL. Biolgics-based therapy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Nature 2012; 91: 30-43. .
 
2.
Blüml S, Scheinecker C, Smolen JS, Redlich K. Targeting TNF receptors in rheumatoid arthritis. Intern. Immunol 2012; 24: 275-281. .
 
3.
Malaviya A, Östör AJ. Rheumatoid arthritis and the era of biologic therapy. Inflamnopharmacol 2012; 20: 59-69. .
 
4.
Kucharz EJ. Nowa metoda porównywania różnych leków badanych w odrębnych problemach klinicznych (mixed treatment comparison). Reumatologia 2009; 47: 310-311. .
 
5.
Nixon RM, Bansback N, Brennan A. Using mixed treatment comparison and meta-regression to perform indirect comparisons to estimate the efficacy of biologic treatments in rheumatoid arthritis. Stat Med 2007; 26: 1237-1254. .
 
6.
Singh JA, Christiansen R, Wells GA, et al. Biologics for rheumatoid arthritis: an overview of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 4: CD007848. .
 
7.
Gert GJD, Hochberg MC, Boers M, et al. Indirect comparison of tocilizumab and other biologic agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to disease – modyfying antirheumatic drugs. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2010; 39: 425-441. .
 
8.
Devine EB, Alfonso-Cristancho R, Sullivan SD. Effectiveness of biologic therapies for rheumatoid arthritis: an indirect comparison approach. Pharmacotherapy 2011; 31: 39-51. .
 
9.
Schmitz S, Adams R, Walsh CD, et al. A mixed treatment comparison of the efficacy of anti-TNF agents in rheumatoid arthritis for methotrexate non-responders demonstrating differences between treatments: a Bayesian approach. Ann Rheum Dis 2012; 71: 225-230. .
 
10.
Aaltonen KJ, Virkki LM, Malmivaara A, et al. Systemic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of existing TNF bloking agents in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. PLOS One 2012; 7: e30275. .
 
11.
Desai RJ, Hansen RA, Rao JK, et al. Mixed treatment comparison of the treatment discontinuations of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Pharmacother 2012; 46: 1491-1505. .
 
12.
Turkstra E, Ng SK, Senffham PA. A mixed treatment comparison of the short-term efficacy of biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in established rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Med Res Opin 2011; 27: 1885-1897. .
 
13.
Mandema JW., Salinger DH, Baumgartner SW, Gibbs MA. A dose-response meta-analysis for quantifying relative efficacy of biologics in rheumatoid arthritis. Nature 2011; 90: 828-835. .
 
14.
Gallego-Galisteo M, Villa-Rubio A, Alegre-del Rey E, et al. Indirect comparison of biological treatments in refractory rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Pharm Ther 2011; 37: 301-307. .
 
15.
Van der Heijde D, Keyston EC, Curtis JR, et al. Timing and magnitude of initial change in disease activity score 28 predicts the likelihood of achieving low disease activity at 1 year in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with certolizumab pegol: a post-hoc analysis of the RAPID 1 trial. J Rheumatol 2012; 39: 1326-1333. .
 
16.
Weinblatt ME, Schiff M, Valente R, et al. Head-to-head comparison of subcutaneous abatacept versus adalimumab for rheumatoid arthritis: findings of a phase IIIb, multinational, prospective, randomized study. Arthritis Rheum 2013; 65: 28-38. .
 
17.
Gabay C, Emery P, van Vollenhoven R, et al.; ADACTA Study Investigators. Tocilizumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (ADACTA): a randomised, double-blind, controlled phase 4 trial. Lancet 2013; 381: 1541-1549. .
 
18.
Launois R, Avouac B, Berenbaum F, et al. Comparison of certolizumab pegol with other anticytokine agents for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a multiple-treatment Bayesian metaanalysis. J Rheumatol 2011; 38: 835-845.
 
Copyright: © Narodowy Instytut Geriatrii, Reumatologii i Rehabilitacji w Warszawie. This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
eISSN:2084-9834
ISSN:0034-6233
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top