Introduction

Relapsing polychondritis (RP) is a rare, clinically heterogeneous, multi-systemic inflammatory disease characterised by recurrent inflammation of the cartilaginous structures and proteoglycan-rich organs. It affects primarily the cartilages of the ear, nose, larynx, tracheobronchial tree, and ribs, but the inflammatory process may damage also connective tissue components of the heart, large vessels (especially the aorta), eyes, inner ear, skin, joints, kidneys, and other organs. Clinical manifestations vary from isolated auricular chondritis to life-threatening systemic features. Red swollen pinna is the most recognised symptom of RP, while other clinical manifestations are not as typical. The course of the disease consists of recurrent acute and painful inflammation in different organs followed by asymptomatic periods with the silently ongoing inflammatory process. Relapsing polychondritis leads to progressive degeneration of cartilaginous structure and connective tissue, which may cause serious complications such as airway collapse or obstruction, deafness, loss of vision, aortic and other large vessel aneurysms, cardiac arrhythmia, heart failure, or renal insufficiency [13].

Relapsing polychondritis occurs most frequently between the ages of 40 and 60 years. Data on RP incidence and prevalence comes mainly from national population-based studies. The incidence of RP estimated in a study performed recently in Hungary was about two per million person-years, which is comparable to the incidence in the US [4]. In Hungary, the overall 10-year survival was good (75–88.3%) and comparable to that of the general population, which the authors attribute to early diagnosis. The distribution of incidences across regions may be suggestive of sunlight exposure and arsenic drinking water pollution as possible environmental triggers of RP. A high prevalence (56%) of other autoimmune conditions was found among the Hungarian RP patients, with Sjögren syndrome as the most common concomitant autoimmune disease [4, 5].

Although, comparing to Hungary, the incidence of the disease in UK was found to be much lower (0.71 per million person-years), the standardised mortality ratio was over twice as high as in the UK general population (2.16, 95% CI: 1.24–3.51, p < 0.01), with respiratory tract disease, heart disease, and cancer as the most frequent causes of death. The mean age at diagnosis was 55 years for men and 51 years for women, while the period from first symptoms to the diagnosis was on average 1.9 years [6]. At present, the population-based studies concerning RP are scarce. No such study has been performed among the Polish population as of today.

In 1976, McAdam et al. [7] published a prospective study of 23 patients and created the first set of diagnostic criteria. In order to establish the diagnosis, at least three symptoms such as bilateral auricular chondritis, nasal chondritis, nonerosive seronegative inflammatory polyarthritis, ocular inflammation, tracheal or laryngeal cartilages’ inflammation, and audio-vestibular dysfunction had to be present.

In 1979, Damiani et Levine [8] introduced the modified McAdam’s criteria, which included histological changes and response to treatment. The diagnosis could be made three-way: either based on McAdam’s criteria with no histological tests necessary; in the presence of at least one McAdam’s sign accompanied by typical histologic changes; or in the presence of chondritis in at least two different sites and a good treatment response [8].

In 1986, Michet et al. [9] proposed the most recent set of criteria, once more based solely on symptoms. In order to meet the criteria, a patient has to present either with cartilage inflammation in at least two locations, or with a singular-site chondritis accompanied by at least two of the following symptoms: seronegative arthritis, ocular inflammation, hearing loss, and/or vestibular dysfunction [9]. Three sets of diagnostic criteria for RP are presented in Table I.

Table I

Three sets of diagnostic criteria for relapsing polychondritis

McAdam et al. (1976)Damiani et al. (1979)Michet et al. (1986)
SymptomsBilateral auricular chondritis
Nasal chondritis
Respiratory tract chondritis
Non-erosive seronegative polyarthritis
Ocular inflammation
Audiovestibular damage
A criteria:
Bilateral auricular chondritis
Nasal cartilage inflammation
Respiratory tract chondritis
Non-erosive seronegative polyarthritis
Ocular inflammation
Audiovestibular damage
A criteria:
Auricular cartilage inflammation
Nasal cartilage inflammation
Laryngotracheal cartilage inflammation
B criteria:
Seronegative arthritis
Ocular inflammation
Hearing loss
Vestibular dysfunction
B criterion:
Histological confirmation
C criterion:
Positive response to corticosteroids or dapsone
Required criteria≥ 3≥ 3 (A) or ≥ 1 (A) and (B) or ≥ 2 (A) criteria and (C)≥ 2 (A) or ≥ 1 (A) and 2 (B)

Relapsing polychondritis poses a diagnostic challenge due to its rarity of occurrence, wide variety of clinical manifestations, and lack of validated criteria. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical picture in patients with RP based on the experience of one centre, as well as reference to the available literature.

Material and methods

A retrospective case analysis of 10 patients (six women and four men) with symptoms of RP, hospitalised at the Department of Rheumatology and Internal Diseases of Wrocław University Hospital between January 2008 and December 2018, was carried out.

All of them were of Caucasian origin, n = 9 were Polish and n = 1 was French. The average age at the onset of the first symptoms in our group was 53.2 years. The female to male ratio was 3 : 2. The clinical features, including first symptoms, age of onset, time from onset to diagnosis, and laboratory findings at first hospitalisation at our Department were analysed. Diagnoses were verified according to the three sets of criteria (characterised by Damiani and Levine, Michet, and McAdam, respectively) [79].

Results

The diagnosis according to McAdam’s criteria was confirmed in five patients (50%). Both Michet’s and Damiani and Levine’s sets of criteria were fulfilled in eight cases (80%). Nine out of 10 patients fulfilled at least one of the three sets of criteria. One patient did not fulfil any set of criteria, but the auricular inflammation improvement after corticosteroid treatment was typical for RP. This case was classified as a probable first episode of RP that required further observation. Analysis of how each patient fulfilled different diagnostic criteria is presented in Table II.

Table II

Case analysis of diagnostic criteria fulfilment

CaseIIIIIIIVVVIVIIVIIIIXX
Fulfilment of criteria according to McAdam et al.YesNoYesNoYesNoYesNoNoYes
The number of present criteria according to McAdam et al.3242526114
Fulfilment of criteria according to Michet et al.YesYesYesYesYesYesYesNoNoYes
The number of present A criteria2222323111
The number of present B criteria0020104002
Fulfilment of criteria according to Damiani et al.YesYesYesNoYesYesYesYesNoYes
3 McAdam’s criteria presentYesNoYesNoYesNoYesNoNoYes
1 McAdam’s criterion and positive histological biopsyNAYesYesNANAYesNAYesNoNA
2 McAdam’s criteria and positive response to corticosteroids or dapsoneYesYesYesNoYesYesNANoNAYes

[i] NA – not applicable

The mean age (±standard deviation) at diagnosis was 54.4 ±13.3 years and ranged from 32 to 73 years. It was lower in the group of men (on average 53.2 years) compared to women (on average 55 years). The symptoms suggestive of the RP diagnosis were mainly inflammation of the pinna (in 80% of patients) and laryngeal stenosis (in 20% of patients).

The mean age when initial symptoms were observed was 52.3 ±12.0 years and ranged from 31 to 69 years. Auricular chondritis was the first manifestation of the disease in 40% of cases (n = 4), laryngeal chondritis in 20% (n = 2), nasal chondritis in 10% (n = 1), and bronchial stenosis in 10% (n = 1). Other initial symptoms were polyarthritis that was present in 10% of cases and general symptoms observed in 10%. The latter are common for many different disorders and were established as first signs of RP only on retrospective analysis. In two cases polyarthritis and general symptoms emerged as the first manifestation, and the suggestion of the diagnosis of RP was made after the occurrence of redness and oedema of the pinna.

Comparative characteristics of the examined patients in terms of age, time of diagnosis, and clinical symptoms are presented in Table III.

Table III

Characteristic of first and diagnostically crucial symptoms along with age at the emergence of first and crucial manifestations and delay of diagnosis in the studied cases

CaseIIIIIIIVVVIVIIVIIIIXX
GenderFemaleFemaleMaleFemaleFemaleFemaleFemaleMaleMaleMale
The first symptomBronchial stenosisNasal chondritisGeneral symptomsLaryngeal stenosisRed earRed earLaryngeal stenosisRed earRed earArthritis
The diagnostically crucial symptomRed earRed earRed earLaryngeal stenosisRed earRed earLaryngeal stenosisRed earRed earRed ear
Age at the emergence of the first symptom53 years52 years58 years69 years55 years55 years31 years37 years45 years68 years
Age at the diagnosis58 years53 years59 years73 years57 years58 years32 years37 years45 years (RP highly probable)73 years
Time from the first symptom to the diagnosis58 months9 months6 months41 months8 months21 months15 months4 months2 months48 months
Time from the crucial symptom to the diagnosis34 months2 months2 months41 months8 months21 months15 months4 monthsDiagnosis not yet confirmed15 months

Auricular chondritis was the most common clinical manifestation in our case series. It occurred in 8/9 patients (88.8%) with a confirmed diagnosis and in one patient suspected for RP. The average age at the onset of auricular chondritis was 52.3 ±11.89 years and ranged from 34 to 69 years. The time between the onset of this sign and the diagnosis of RP was between two and 34 months, on average 11 months. One out of nine patients developed inflammation of the pinna after the diagnosis of RP (11.1%). Only in 1 out of 9 patients (11.1%) no auricular chondritis was observed. An example of red ear in one of our patients is shown in Figure 1.

Fig. 1

Inflammation of pinna.

https://reu.termedia.pl/f/fulltexts/104570/RU-57-83234-g001_min.jpg

The second most frequently affected organ in our case series was the nose cartilage (7/9 patients, 77.7%). Nasal chondritis turned out to be less characteristic for RP. Patients reported the feeling of fullness of the nasal bridge, and tenderness or pain at the base of the nose. Only one patient suffered from chronic nasal mucosal discharge. Permanent destruction of the nasal cartilage with a characteristic saddle-nose deformity was observed also in one case and occurred after six years from the onset of the disease.

Respiratory tract chondritis involved the larynx (4/9 patients, 44.4%), the trachea (3/9 patients, 33.3%), and bronchi (3/9 patients, 33.3%) manifesting as dry cough, dyspnoea, and hoarseness. Total damage to the laryngeal cartilage presented in two female patients (22.2%) as life-threatening stenosis with respiratory failure requiring tracheotomy. The same patients also showed the presence of tracheal involvement. The narrowing of the trachea and intermediary right bronchi was diagnosed as the cause of a chronic dry cough in one case (11.1%).

Cardiovascular abnormalities were found in five patients (55.5%). They included valve insufficiency (n = 3), dilatation of the ascending thoracic aorta (n = 1) and arrhythmia (n = 1) which required pacemaker implantation. The patient diagnosed with arrhythmia had also aneurysms of iliac arteries, which were discovered in the course of the diagnostic process, and it was a reason for stent-graft implantation.

Arthritis was present in four cases (44.4%). Other manifestations included ocular involvement (33.3%) as: episcleritis (n = 1) (Fig. 2) and scleritis (n = 2), hearing loss (22%, n = 2), vestibular syndrome (n = 1), renal involvement (n = 1), costal chondritis (n = 1), and clinically significant anaemia (n = 2). In Table IV disease manifestations in individual cases at the time of first hospitalisation are presented.

Table IV

Relapsing polychondritis manifestations in individual cases

CaseIIIIIIIVVVIVIIVIIIIXXTotal number of cases
GenderFemaleFemaleMaleFemaleFemaleFemaleFemaleMaleMaleMale10
Auricular chondritisYes (bilateral)Yes (bilateral)Yes (bilateral)NoYes (bilateral)Yes (bilateral)Yes (bilateral)Yes (bilateral)Yes (bilateral)Yes (unilateral)9
Nasal chondritisYesYesYesYesYesYesYes (nasal bridge collapse)NoNoNo7
Respiratory tract chondritisYes (bronchial and subglottic stenosis)NoNoYes (laryngeal stenosis, tracheotomy, tracheomalacia)Yes (laryngeal oedema)NoYes (laryngeal stenosis, tracheotomy, tracheal and bronchial stenosis)NoNoYes (thickening of the bronchial walls)5
ArthritisNoNoYes (confirmed by USG)NoYes (confirmed by USG)NoYes (confirmed by USG)NoNoYes (confirmed by USG)4
Ocular inflammationNoNoYes (episcleritis)NoYes (scleritis)NoYes (scleritis)NoNoNo3
Audio-vestibular damageNoNoNoNoNoNoYes (hearing loss in the left ear – vestibular damage)NoNoYes (progressive hearing loss)2
Haematological featuresNoNoYes (anaemia)Yes (anaemia)NoNoNoNoNoNo2
Cardiac involvementYes (valvular disease)Yes (valvular disease)Yes (arrhythmia)NoNoNoNoNoNoYes (valvular disease)4
Vascular involvementNoNoYes (iliac arteries aneurysms)Yes (dilatation of the ascending aorta)NoNoNoNoNoNo2
Renal involvementNoNoYes (erythrocyturia)NoNoNoNoNoNoNo1
Costal chondritisNoNoNoNoNoNoYesNoNoNo1
Skin lesionsNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo0
Nervous system involvementNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo0
General symptomsNoNoYes (fever, weight loss, fatigue)NoNoNoNoNoNoNo1
Total number of manifestations4393328115
Fig. 2

Episcleritis.

https://reu.termedia.pl/f/fulltexts/104570/RU-57-83234-g002_min.jpg

Laboratory results (selected parameters are shown in Table V), such as levels of inflammatory markers, were generally normal or moderately elevated. Only one patient with general symptoms had a significantly elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and concentration of C-reactive protein (CRP). Positive antinuclear antibodies (ANA) were found in four cases (40%) in a titre of 1 : 320.

Table V

Selected laboratory results in individual cases

Case/GenderESR n: 0–10 (mm/h)CRP n: 0–5 (mg/l)Hb n: F: 12–16, M: 14–18 (g/dl)ANA n: < 1 : 100ANCA n: negative
I/Female287.4614.0NegativeNegative
II/Female141.3913.4NegativeNegative
III/Male124128.09.5Positive 1 : 320 (ENA negative)Negative
IV/Female110.6110.1NegativeNegative
V/Female90.3413.6Positive 1 : 320 (ENA negative)Negative
IV/Female150.4514.6Positive 1 : 320 SSA+++Negative
VII/FemaleND0.3912.8NegativeNegative
VIII/Male41,7316.7NegativeNegative
IX/Male173.313.7Positive 1 : 320 (ENA negative)Negative
X/Male71.5813.9NegativeNegative

[i] ESR – erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP – C-reactive protein; Hb – haemoglobin; ANA – positive antinuclear antibodies; ENA – extractable nuclear antigens; ANCA – antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody; ND – no data.

All patients received standard therapy with steroidal treatment in 90% of cases; one patient was treated with Dapsone. The doses of prednisone ranged from 10 mg/day to 1 mg/kg/day depending on clinical manifestations. A good response was observed in 80% (n = 8) of cases. In two cases with laryngeal stenosis without a good response to steroids, prednisone was used in doses of 30 mg/day and 75 mg/day (with periodic pulses of methylprednisolone at a dose of 500 mg/day), respectively.

Discussion

Relapsing polychondritis incidence, age at the time of first symptoms, and diagnosis

The average age at the onset of the first symptoms in our group was higher than that reported in the study by Dion et al. [10], in which it was 43.5 ±15 years for men and 47 ±15 years for women, but it was similar to one established in the Hazra et al. [6] study from 2015 performed in large group of 117 RP patients. The difference may result from the different sizes of the studied groups.

The delay from the time of the first symptom to the diagnosis was on average one year (and up to 25 years) in the study from Dion et al. [10] and 1.9 years in the study from Hazra et al. In our research, the average delay was 1.7 years, ranging from 2 months to 4.8 years, and was similar to the delay observed by Hazra et al. [6].

Establishing the time of the first manifestation of RP is easier when the disease starts with a typical symptom such as ear chondritis. In our patients with auricular chondritis, the average delay of the diagnosis was noticeably shorter than in cases with less characteristic initial manifestations. It is clear that the appearance of the typical symptom of red ear (painful oedema and redness of the pinna in the cartilaginous part but not in the cartilage-less earlobe) raises the suspicion of RP and shortens the diagnostic process.

Ear and nose manifestations

Red ear is the presenting symptom of disease in 20–41% of cases [3, 10]. Although this symptom suggests the diagnosis of RP, often other causes such as infection, insect bite, and allergic dermatitis are suspected at first, and so an initial misdiagnosis is quite common.

Auricular chondritis was present in 90% of our patients in the course of the disease, similarly to data from the literature (85–95%) [1, 3] and was the most frequent manifestation of RP. Onset of inflammation is abrupt, mono- or bilateral. The cartilaginous part of the pinna is red, painful, and swollen. The ear lobe, which lacks cartilage, remains intact. As a consequence of recurrent episodes of inflammation, the cartilage is damaged and replaced by fibrous connective tissue. The pinna loses its normal morphology and becomes floppy and nodular or looks like “cauliflower”.

While the external ear involvement is the most common clinical feature of RP, abnormal audio-vestibular findings are observed in 40% of cases [11]. Unilateral or bilateral conductive and sensorineural hearing loss was observed in up to 46% of patients with RP [3]. Conductive type hearing loss may be related to the oedema of the external ear canal or the eustachian tube. Closure of the external auditory meatus may lead to serious otitis media. Inflammation of vestibular structures or vasculitis of the internal auditory artery may cause sensorineural type hearing loss. In our study, hearing impairment was observed in two patients, including one patient with hearing loss in one ear and disturbances of balance.

The incidence of nasal cartilage inflammation in RP patients, another laryngological symptom of the disease, varies across different regions, from 10% in Brazil [12], 20–35% in the USA, 56–63% in Germany and France, and up to 81% in India [3, 1315]. It manifests as a stuffed nose, tenderness or pain located in the nasal bridge, and, rarely, epistaxis. Progressive inflammation leads to cartilage damage, which may result in the flattening of the nasal bridge and a “saddle nose” deformity. Such a deformity is observed more frequently in female patients and in those under 50 years of age [1].

While Michet [9] described the occurrence of the saddle nose deformity in 29% of patients, in our study it was found in only 10% (one woman).

Nevertheless, nasal chondritis occurred in 70% of patients and was the second most common manifestation of RP in our study. In one case, it was the cause of a prior hospitalisation at the Department of Otolaryngology. However, a diagnosis of RP was not established at that time, and only a retrospective analysis of the course of the disease related to the diagnosis of the auricular chondritis led to the conclusion that previous inflammation of the nasal cartilage was the first symptom of RP. In fact, symptoms such as nasal congestion, nose soreness, or nasal discharge are not characteristic for RP and can be easily taken for infectious or allergic rhinitis or sinusitis.

Airway involvement

Airway involvement is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in RP. Its prevalence is about 50%, and the prevalence of upper airway collapse is 20%. All the cartilaginous parts of the upper and lower airways can be affected [16]. Involvement of the larynx may cause subglottic stenosis. It may manifest with hoarseness, cough, dysphonia, wheezing, stridor, dyspnoea, choking, and tenderness in the anterior part of the neck. Sometimes it has to be treated with emergency tracheostomy. The involvement of trachea and main bronchi may develop insidiously and may cause fatal respiratory tract collapse. It is more difficult to diagnose, and one should actively search for this complication because it can have few symptoms. It can manifest with dry cough, dyspnoea, and wheezing, and be mistaken for asthma [17]. In worse cases it can progress to respiratory distress and tracheal collapse. Also, the bronchi can be affected, and inflammatory infiltrate of the cartilage and the area around the bronchial wall with consequent destruction and fibrosis of the cartilaginous parts may lead to serious stenosis of the lumen. Diagnostic tools to assess respiratory tract involvement are respiratory function tests, chest radiograph, or better dynamic chest CT – during inspiration and expiration, to observe the collapse of bronchial or tracheal wall, which occurs due to tracheobronchomalacia [18]. In the early stage of the disease, CT shows thickening of the airway wall and cartilage attenuation, and in later stages focal or diffuse luminal narrowing, which is caused by cartilage destruction and fibrosis.

Bronchoscopy may confirm the mucosal inflammation, airway stenosis, or tracheobronchomalacia, but it has to be performed with caution because of the fragility of airway wall and risk of perforation [19]. Sometimes, respiratory tract involvement demands reconstruction surgery, which is also associated with serious risk because inflamed tissues may collapse during the operating procedure, and it may be complicated by infection. In our patients, involvement of the respiratory tract occurred in 50% and airways collapse due to laryngeal stenosis occurred in 20% of patients, which is comparable to the general prevalence of these complications in RP. Isolated chondritis of the larynx or trachea may also be observed. It is especially challenging when chondritis or the respiratory tract is present and it is an isolated feature of RP. In three of our patients, airways involvement was the first symptom of the disease. In one of them it was made as late as after 58 months, in another it was 45 months later, and in a third it was 15 months later. Two patients required emergency tracheostomy. In both of them, the rest of the tracheobronchial tree was gradually involved; one patient later developed critical stenosis of trachea and bronchi, the other – tracheomalacia. In another three of our patients, the airway involvement was diagnosed by imaging methods – mostly CT of the neck and chest. One patient had stenosis of the right bronchus, one had thickening on the bronchial wall on CT, and one had laryngeal oedema revealed in endoscopy. In two of them, the diagnosis was made earlier, thanks to the concomitant features of cartilage inflammation of other sites.

Our series and other reports show that in rare cases airway involvement in RP may precede inflammation in other cartilaginous structures. Such a situation may cause diagnostic difficulties and delay diagnosis.

Because RP is a very rare disease, it is not always suspected in patients with subglottic stenosis, especially without other features of connective tissue disease and without visible cartilage involvement in other sites. Differential diagnosis as granulomatous polyangiitis should be considered, which is also a rare disease but still more common than RP.

Respiratory tract involvement is associated with poor prognosis in RP patients. Strictures, mucosal oedema, and cartilage collapse can lead to fatal airway obstruction, which requires tracheostomy and is a poor prognostic sign. Tracheobronchomalacia may need airway stenting. However, the risk of surgical procedure on the inflamed and fragile tissue is high.

When the patient has other signs of RP, such as auricular or nasal cartilage inflammation, the diagnosis is obvious, and one should actively search for airway involvement.

Ocular manifestations

Ocular manifestations of RP are common and were present in 30% of cases in our study (episcleritis n = 1, scleritis n = 2) and in up to 60% of patients, according to the literature [20].

In a cohort study performed by the Mayo Clinic on 112 patients with RP, 21 (18.75%) of them had eye symptoms at the onset of the disease and 57 (50.89%) were diagnosed with ocular involvement later on [21].

All structures of the eye may be involved in the course of RP. Common early findings include episcleritis, scleritis, conjunctivitis, iridocyclitis, chorioretinitis, corneal infiltrates, and lid oedema [21].

Scleritis may be the initial manifestation of RP and has some typical characteristics when connected with RP. Sainz-de-la-Maza et al. [22], in a retrospective analysis of 13 RP patients diagnosed with scleritis, compared 113 patients with other autoimmune diseases and showed that scleritis in RP patients was more often bilateral (p = 0.001), necrotising (23.1%; p = 0.02), recurrent (p = 0.001), and associated with decreased vision (p = 0.012). A significant proportion of RP patients from that study (9/13, 69.2%) had one or more other autoimmune conditions, which on average preceded RP by nine years (between two and 21 years).

Uveitis is a less common and more serious complication of RP. It presents as red eye, ocular pain, and decreased vision. This condition may be associated with keratitis, macular oedema, retinal haemorrhages, and retinal vasculitis [20]. In the course of RP, uveitis is often bilateral and recurrent, and if left untreated it may lead to permanent vision loss.

Less frequently reported are exophthalmos associated with an orbital tumour or pseudotumor and optic neuritis, accompanied by orbital periostitis on MRI. Late ocular complications include: cataract, glaucoma, exudative retinal detachment, and blindness.

Arthritis

According to a 2016 study from Mathian et al. [2], arthritis in the course of the disease occurs in 38.8% of patients, compared to 51–85% described in previous publications. In our study, arthritis confirmed by joint ultrasound examination was found in 30% of patients. In one case (10%), arthritis was the first manifestation of the disease. The delay between this symptom and the diagnosis was four years. Arthritis in the course of RP is seronegative, and if it is not associated with cartilage involvement, the recognition of RP only on its basis is not possible, according to the applicable criteria.

Cardiovascular involvement

In a large cohort study performed in Japan on 239 RP patients, the prevalence of cardiac involvement was 7.1%, compared to 6–23% worldwide [23]. In the Japanese cohort, heart manifestations were more frequent in males and older patients (p < 0.01). The mean age of patients with cardiac RP was 72 years, while the mean age of the onset of symptoms in these patients was 65 years. In comparison to RP patients without cardiac symptoms, heart involvement in RP patients was connected with external ear manifestations (100% vs. 76%), renal symptoms (35% vs. 6.7%), central nervous system complications (29% vs. 8.1%), and an increased death rate (35% vs. 9.2%). In the cited study, the causes of mortality in cardiac RP patients included acute myocardial infarction, recurrent angina pectoris, heart failure, cerebral haemorrhage, and pneumonia [23]. Other fatal outcomes described in the literature include complete heart block, aortic valve rupture, and acute aortic insufficiency.

Late cardiovascular RP complications include atrioventricular conduction disturbances, pericarditis, valvulitis, and large- and medium-sized vasculitis, accompanied by the aneurysm formation. According to the literature, 4% to 7% of RP patients develop aneurysmal disease. In the presented analysis, one patient had bilateral aneurysms of the common iliac arteries. This seems to be an extremely rare finding because there has been only one case report on an aneurysm with a similar location in the course of RP [24]. Other unusual aneurysm sites include pulmonary arteries, and intracranial and renal locations. The most common aneurysm site in patients with RP is the aorta, and in one study it was involved in as many as 6.4% of RP patients [25]. In our study, only one elderly female patient had an abnormally wide aorta, not yet classified as an aneurysm, three patients (30%) had mild valve defects, and a male patient – one with iliac arteries aneurysms – had a life-threatening arrhythmia.

Renal manifestations

According to Rednic et al. [14], the existence of kidney involvement in the course of RP is a controversial issue, probably due to a possible misdiagnosis. In a previous study from Chang-Miller et al. [26], 29 out of 129 RP patients treated at the Mayo Clinic had renal symptoms, but biopsy was positive in less than 10% of patients with suspicion of renal RP.

In our case series, renal abnormalities presented by mild erythrocyturia were limited to one patient with cardiovascular complications of RP.

Haematological symptoms

An estimated 4–8% of RP patients have myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) [6, 10]. There are no cases of MDS in our study. In 20% of our patients, clinically significant anaemia was diagnosed.

Cutaneous, mucosal, and central nervous system manifestations

The most common skin and mucosal symptoms in the course of RP reported in the literature were erythema, oral aphthae, and superficial phlebitis. Less frequent manifestations included erythema multiforme, angioneurotic oedema, pustular skin disease, urticaria, purpura, haemorrhagic blushes, and erythema nodosum.

According to the literature, skin lesions occur in 1/3 of patients [2]. However, they were not observed in the studied group. The absence of reports of skin changes may be due to their paroxysmal nature and patients not considering them as related to the underlying condition.

Also, we did not notice nervous system involvement, occurring only rarely (in 3% of patients, according to the literature) in the course of RP. It may be manifested with headaches, memory disturbances, paraesthesia, and cranial nerve neuropathies, probably due to cerebral vasculitis. Also, about 20 cases of RP patients with a mild form of meningitis and/or encephalitis have been described [27].

Laboratory findings

There are no specific laboratory tests characteristic for RP. Elevated ESR and CRP may be detected during the acute onset of RP, but more than 10% of patients have a normal CRP level even during an RP flare [2]. In contrast to results from Chuah et al. [28], who observed elevated ESR in 80% and CRP in 50% of their study, only 10% of cases from our study presented significantly increased levels of inflammatory markers.

In an analysis of 111 RP patients from Piette et al. [29], ANA titre > 1/100 was found in only 9% of cases. McAdam et al. [7] found positive ANA in four of their 18 patients (22%). In the present study, 40% of RP patients with no coexisting connective tissue disorder were ANA-positive.

The clinical phenotypes of relapsing polychondritis

Analysing the manifestations of RP in individual cases, we observed various forms of the disease, from a mild course with the inflammation of the pinna (n = 2) without damage to other organs, to a severe multi-systemic course with vital organ damage.

Dion et al. [10] divided a group of 142 RP patients into three groups with diverse clinical phenotypes. The first group (9%) consisted of patients with the most severe course of the disease, referred to as a haematological phenotype, because many of them had MDS (83%). In these patients, other common features included skin lesions (92%), general symptoms (83%), and heart involvement (58%), without respiratory tract changes. The second group of patients (26%) was characterised as the respiratory phenotype with laryngeal or tracheal and bronchial involvement, and the third group, the largest (65%), as the mild phenotype with few symptoms.

According to the classification from Dion et al., in our study, one patient (10%) represented a haematological phenotype, presenting with anaemia, general symptoms, high levels of inflammatory parameters, arrhythmia, and iliac artery aneurysms (in total nine RP manifestations) but no MDS.

Five patients in our study (50%) represented a respiratory phenotype with airway cartilage involvement, including two patients with life-threatening laryngeal obstruction requiring tracheostomy. Four patients (40%) could be classified as a mild phenotype with the inflammation of the pinna as the main manifestation of the disease.

The phenotype division according to Dion et al. [10] may be useful for determining the prognosis and deciding on intensity of treatment. However, as cardiac and cardiovascular complications are associated with highest mortality among the RP patients, we would suggest the fourth, cardiovascular phenotype, be included in RP patients’ phenotypical classification.

The role of diagnostic criteria

The classification criteria for RP by McAdam [7], Damiani and Levine [8], or Mitchet et al. [9] are used in order to make the diagnosis of RP. However, there are no clinical practice guidelines, nor randomised clinical studies available for RP in the literature review, because there are no specific laboratory markers that could be used for diagnosis or evaluation of the disease activity.

In our study, the RP diagnosis was confirmed in 50% of cases (n = 5) according to McAdam’s criteria, in 80% of cases (n = 8) according to the criteria of Damiani et al., and in 80% of cases according to Mitchet’s criteria, including two cases of patients who did not meet the McAdam’s criteria and one patient who did not meet either McAdam’s or Damiani and Levine’s criteria. One patient met only Mitchet’s criteria, and another patient met only Damiani and Levine’s criteria.

Modified Michet’s criteria are the most commonly used worldwide. However, no set of criteria has been yet validated due to the scarcity of data on their sensitivity and specificity. The available information on their sensitivity comes from one small cohort study. In a retrospective analysis of 18 patients with a diagnosis of RP performed at the Berlin University Centre, the best sensitivity (88.9%) characterised the Damiani and Levine criteria, versus Michet’s (66.7%) and McAdam’s (50%). The sensitivity of Michet’s criteria was improved to 88.9% after modification [30]. The specificity of the criteria is yet to be established.

McAdam’s criteria may be helpful in the case of longer disease duration and with at least three different manifestations. Auricular chondritis, in these criteria, is important but only when bilateral, and hearing loss together with balance disturbances is considered as one symptom.

A careful analysis of the manifestations of the disease allows a diagnosis to be established without biopsy in 50% of cases. The cartilage biopsy may be useful in patients with the mild phenotype and few symptoms, such as in the case of our patient who presented with isolated auricular chondritis.

Conclusions

Relapsing polychondritis is a rare disease, which causes difficulties in diagnosis due to the non-simultaneous occurrence of symptoms. During the onset, various organs may be involved, and only analysis of the entire medical history leads to proper diagnosis. The approach to the RP problem should not be focused only on making a diagnosis but also on detection of latent and potentially life-threatening manifestations such as aneurysms of large vessels, arrhythmias, heart valve defects, and narrowing of the airways.

Relapsing polychondritis should also be considered in differential diagnosis of respiratory tract narrowings. The increased awareness of the disease among physicians, both rheumatologists and specialists outside the field of rheumatology, including general practitioners, may lead to early diagnosis and treatment. Taking into account data from the literature and the presented analysis, we suggest that it is very useful to apply the three sets of criteria simultaneously in the RP diagnostic process.