ORIGINAL PAPER
All that glitters is not gold: sacroiliitis
More details
Hide details
Submission date: 2018-08-06
Final revision date: 2018-10-10
Acceptance date: 2018-10-21
Online publication date: 2018-10-31
Publication date: 2018-10-31
Reumatologia 2018;56(5):289-293
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of „rheumatic” and „non-rheumatic” changes of the sacro-iliac joints (SIJ).
Material and methods:
We performed MRI in 210 patients with suspected inflammatory low back pain. We sorted and analysed the characteristics of sacroiliac bone lesions in „rheumatic” and „non-rheumatic” patients and assessed the diagnostic values of their extent and location. SIJ lesions were classified on the basis of their location into two categories: unilateral and bilateral. Their extent was then measured and assigned to one of two groups: <1 cm or ≥ 1 cm.
Results:
In 45 cases (21%), the MRI findings matched the clinical diagnosis of „rheumatic” sacroiliitis. Interestingly, in 99 cases (47%) the SIJ changes were classified as „non-rheumatic”. L5–S1 degenerative changes, scoliosis and pelvic asymmetry were most frequently encountered as concomitant phenomena in our study.
Conclusions:
MRI of the sacroiliac joints in patients suspected of inflammatory low back pain demonstrated more often “non-rheumatic” changes.
REFERENCES (16)
1.
Frymoyer JW. Back pain and sciatica. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 291-300.
2.
Fortin JD, Dwyer AP, West S. Sacroiliac joint: pain referal maps upon applying a new injection/arthrography technique. Part I: Asymptomatic volunteers. Spine 1994; 19: 1475-1482.
3.
Tarantino A, Jablonska JP, D’Aprile P. What’s in a name? That which we call sacroiliitis by any other name would look the same... Reumatologia 2018; 56: 129-130.
4.
Sieper J, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, et al. New criteria for inflammatory backpain in patients with chronic back pain: a real patient exercise by experts from the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS). Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68: 784-788.
5.
Generali E, Bose T, Selmi C, et al. Classification of spondyloarthritis as autoimmune or autoinflammatory. Autoimmun Rev 2018; 17: 935-941.
6.
Bereau M, Prati C, Wendling D. Sacroiliac edema by MRI does not always indicate spondylarthritis. Joint Bone Spine 2011; 78: 646.
7.
Schueller-Wiedekamm C, Schueller G. Sacroiliitis oder pseudosacroiliitis. Radiologe 2012; 52: 132-140.
8.
D’Aprile P, Tarantino A. MRI of rheumatic spine. A case based atlas. Springer 2014.
9.
Berthelot JM, le Goff B, Maugars Y, Laredo JD. Sacroiliac joint edema by MRI: far more often mechanical than inflammatory? Joint Bone Spine 2016; 83: 3-5.
10.
Drezner JA, Herring SA. Managing low-back pain. Steps to optimize function and hasten return to activity. Phys Sportsmed 2001; 29: 37-43.
11.
Deyo RA, Chrkin D, Conrad D. Cost, controversy, crisis: low back pain and the health of the public. Annu Rev Public Health 1991; 12: 141-156.
12.
McCormick A, Fleming D, Charlton J. Morbidity statistics from general practice. Fourth national study 1991–1992. HMSO, Office of Population Censuses and Surveys 1995; Series MB5 No 3, London.
13.
Claudepierre P, Wendling D, Breban M. Ankylosing spondylitis, spondyloarthropathy, spondyloarthritis or spondylarthritis: what’s in a name? Joint Bone Spine 2012; 79: 534-535.
14.
Shibata Y, Shirai Y, Miyamoto M. The aging process in the sacroiliac joint: helical computed tomography analysis. J Ortop Sci 2002; 7: 12-18.
15.
Konin JP, Walz DM. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: classification, imaging, findings and clinical relevance. Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31: 1778-1786.
16.
Lyders EM, Whitlow CT, Baker MD, et al. Imaging and treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures. Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31: 201-210.
Copyright: © Narodowy Instytut Geriatrii, Reumatologii i Rehabilitacji w Warszawie. This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.