EN PL
REVIEW PAPER
DAS28 score vs. ultrasound examination for assessment of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity: comparison and discussion of pros and cons
 
More details
Hide details
 
Submission date: 2015-06-11
 
 
Final revision date: 2015-07-14
 
 
Acceptance date: 2015-08-17
 
 
Online publication date: 2015-09-21
 
 
Publication date: 2015-09-15
 
 
Reumatologia 2015;53(4):213-218
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic connective tissue disease which is characterized by symetrical multiple joints involvement and extra-articular symptoms. Current EULAR diagnostic criteria for RA include disease activity parameters, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), which are used to calculate disease activity scores, including DAS and DAS28. Recently attempts have been made to assess disease activity using imaging diagnostic modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (US). Due to significant progress in therapy effectiveness and early RA diagnosis possibility, imaging modalities become increasingly meaningful and many clinical trials confirm their usefulness. However, there are no consistent criteria for objective assessment of therapy effectiveness based on US. Moreover, it is not US availability that limits its common use, but rather significant variability between operators. This is why US remains only an additional tool to assess therapy efficacy with regard to DAS/DAS28 index.
 
REFERENCES (10)
1.
van Riel PL. Provisional guidelines for measuring disease activity in clinical trials on rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1992; 31: 793-796.
 
2.
Frasen J, van Riel P. Disease Activity Score and the Eular response criteria. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2005; 23 (3 suppl. 39): 93-99.
 
3.
Wislowska M, Kalinska I, Olczyk-Kwiecień B. Stare i nowe metody oceny aktywności choroby, stopnia uszkodzenia tkanek i utraty funkcji w reumatoidalnym zapalaniu stawów. Problemy Lekarskie 2006; 45: 52-56.
 
4.
Magnani M, Salizzoni E, Mulè R, et al. Ultrasonography detection of early bone erosions in the metacarpophalangeal joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2004; 22: 743-748.
 
5.
Jurado RL. Why shouldn’t we determine the erythrocyte sedimentation rate? Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33: 548-549.
 
6.
Brown AK, Quinn MA, Karim Z, et al. Presence of significant synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis patients with disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-induced clinical remission: evidence from an imaging study may explain structural progression. Arthritis Rheum 2006; 54: 3761-3773.
 
7.
Grassi W, Gaywood I, Pande I, et al. From DAS 28 to SAS 1. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2012; 30: 649-651.
 
8.
Naredo E, Möller I, Cruz A, et al. Power Doppler ultrasonographic monitoring of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 58: 2248-2256.
 
9.
Fiocco U, Ferro F, Vezzù M, et al. Rheumatoid and psoriatic knee synovitis: clinical, grey scale, and power Doppler ultrasound assessment of the response to etanercept. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 899-905.
 
10.
Ikeda K, Nakagomi D, Sanayama Y, et al. Correlation of radiographic progression with the cumulative activity of synovitis estimated by power Doppler ultrasound in rheumatoid arthritis: difference between patients treated with methotrexate and those treated with biological agents. J Rheumatol 2013; 40: 1967-1976.
 
Copyright: © Narodowy Instytut Geriatrii, Reumatologii i Rehabilitacji w Warszawie. This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
eISSN:2084-9834
ISSN:0034-6233
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top