EN PL
ORIGINAL PAPER
Patients’ preferences regarding biological treatment in doctors’ and patients’ opinions – the results of the RAISE* questionnaire survey
 
More details
Hide details
 
Online publication date: 2013-04-29
 
 
Reumatologia 2013;51(2):113-118
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The purpose of the study was to assess the preferences of rheumatologists and patients with rheumatoid arthritis regarding the methods and frequency of biological drug administration. Patients were questioned about problems and difficulties associated with the use of biological medications (in particular, the perception of pain upon drug administration). Questions covered a range of issues including self-injection, help provided by relatives and friends or medical personnel, the preferred route of drug administration and dosing frequency, the degree of satisfaction with the effectiveness and safety of currently available therapies, unmet needs in relation to biological therapies, and what would be the ideal rheumatoid arthritis (RA) biological therapy product.
Material and methods: The survey, part of the international RAISE project, conducted in the form of a standardized personal interview by trained interviewers using a paper and pencil interview method, included 30 rheumatologists actively involved in the use of biological therapies and 120 patients receiving biological medications subcutaneously (52%) or intravenously (48%).
Results: Doctors rated performance of a subcutaneous injection by patients as easy or very easy; in their opinion patients rarely experience difficulty opening drug packaging (14%); however, problems do occur more frequently if using an injector (43%). The subcutaneous route of administration is preferred by 83% of patients, who rarely opt for intravenous therapy (3%). According to doctors, 85% of patients self-inject their medication and their preferred frequency of drug administration is once per month. Twenty patients (17%) reported having difficulties opening drug packaging and 19 (16%) experienced problems handling the injector. Twenty-nine patients (24%) reported experiencing fear at the prospect of inserting a needle into their body. Adverse reactions following subcutaneous drug administration occurred in 29 patients and in 12 patients following intravenous drug administration (24% vs. 10%). The most frequently reported complaints were pain (20 patients, i.e. 17%) and allergic reactions at the site of injection (10 patients; 8%). For this reason someone other than the patient, usually a nurse, performed the injections for one in four patients. Subcutaneous drug administration was the preferred route for 46 patients (38%) while 47 preferred intravenous delivery (39%); for the remainder, the route of administration was immaterial. Patients preferred a dosing schedule of once a month or less.
Conclusions: The study revealed significant discrepancies in preferences between doctors and patients. Therefore it is the authors’ opinion that patients should participate in the process of choosing the route of drug administration.
 
REFERENCES (12)
1.
Tang B, Rahman M, Waters HC, Callegari P. Treatment persistence with adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab in combination with methotrexate and the effects on health care costs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Ther 2008; 30: 1375-1384. .
 
2.
Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 2010; 62: 2569-2581.
 
3.
Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Bijlsma JW, et al.; T2T Expert Committee. Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: recommendations of an in­ternational task force. Ann Rheum Dis 2010; 69: 631-637.
 
4.
Wevers-de Boer K, Visser K, Heimans L, et la. Remission induction therapy with methotrexate and prednisone in patients with early rheumatoid and undifferentiated arthritis (the IMPROVED study). Ann Rheum Dis 2012; 71: 1472-1477.
 
5.
Grigor C, Capell H, Stirling A, et al. Effect of a treatment strategy of tight control for rheumatoid arthritis (the TICORA study): a single-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 364: 263-269.
 
6.
Smolen JS, Landewé R, Breedveld FC, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Ann Rheum Dis 2010; 69: 964-975 .
 
7.
Fransen J, Laan RF, Van Der Laar MA, et al. Influence of guideline adherence on outcome in a randomised controlled trial on the efficacy of methotrexate with folate supplementation in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63: 1222-1226. .
 
8.
Tłustochowicz W, Filipowicz-Sosnowska A, Kucharz E i wsp. Postępowanie z chorym na reumatoidalne zapalenie stawów w codziennej praktyce specjalisty reumatologa – wyniki ogólnopolskiego badania ankietowego. Reumatologia 2008; 46: 330-339.
 
9.
Kulig M, Malec Z, Tłustochowicz W. Analiza leczenia ambulatoryjnego metotreksatem chorych leczonych na reumatoidalne zapalenie stawów. Reumatologia 2009; 47: 202-206. .
 
10.
McInnes IB, Combe B, Burmester G. Understanding the patient perspective – results of the Rheumatoid Arthritis: Insights, Strategies & Expectations (RAISE) patient needs survey. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68 (Suppl 3): 240.
 
11.
McInnes I, Burmester G, Jonas M, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis: insights, strategies and expectations – patient perceptions of anti-TNF subcutaneous delivery devices in rheumatoid arthritis [AB0302-HP]. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69 (Suppl 3): 680.
 
12.
Harley CR, Frytak JR, Tandon N. Treatment compliance and dosage administration among rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving infliximab, etanercept, or methotrexate. Am J Manag Care 2003; 9 (6 Suppl): S136-S143.
 
Copyright: © Narodowy Instytut Geriatrii, Reumatologii i Rehabilitacji w Warszawie. This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
eISSN:2084-9834
ISSN:0034-6233
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top