Current issue
Archive
Online first
About the Journal
Editorial Office
Editorial Board
Publisher
Editorial Policies
Ethical standards and procedures
Abstracting and indexing
Reviewers
Honorary Reviewers
Subscription
Contact
Most read articles
Instructions for authors
Article processing charge (APC)
Books and Events
Books
Events
EDITORIAL ARTICLE
Social media platforms: a primer for researchers
1
Department of Internal Medicine No. 2, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine
2
Departments of Rheumatology and Research and Development, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust (Teaching Trust of the
University of Birmingham, UK), Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, West Midlands, UK
Submission date: 2020-12-21
Acceptance date: 2020-12-23
Online publication date: 2021-01-16
Publication date: 2021-04-28
Reumatologia 2021;59(2):68-72
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Social media platforms play an increasingly important role in research, education, and clinical practice. As an inseparable part of open science, these platforms may increase the visibility of research outputs and facilitate scholarly networking. The editors who ethically moderate Twitter, Facebook, and other popular social media accounts for their journals may engage influential authors in the post-publication communication and expand societal implications of their publications. Several social media aggregators track and generate alternative metrics which can be used by researchers for visualizing trending articles in their fields. More and more publishers showcase their achievements by displaying such metrics along with traditional citations. The Scopus database also tracks both metrics to offer a comprehensive coverage of the indexed articles’ impact.
Understanding the advantages and limitations of various social media channels is essential for actively contributing to the post-publication communication, particularly in research-intensive fields such as rheumatology.
Understanding the advantages and limitations of various social media channels is essential for actively contributing to the post-publication communication, particularly in research-intensive fields such as rheumatology.
REFERENCES (35)
1.
Syrkiewicz-Świtała M, Romaniuk P, Strzelecka A, et al. Prospects for the Use of Social Media Marketing Instruments in Health Promotion by Polish Marshal Offices. Front Public Health 2018; 6: 65, DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00065.
2.
Zeng R, Li M. Social Media Use for Health Communication by the CDC in Mainland China: National Survey Study 2009–2020. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22: e19470, DOI: 10.2196/19470.
3.
Lien CH, Cao Y. Examining WeChat users’ motivations, trust, attitudes, and positive word-of-mouth: Evidence from China. Comput Hum Behav 2014; 41: 104–111, DOI: 10.1016/j.chb. 2014.08.013.
4.
Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang W, et al. Concerns Expressed by Chinese Social Media Users During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Content Analysis of Sina Weibo Microblogging Data. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22: e22152, DOI: 10.2196/22152.
5.
Gupta L, Gasparyan AY, Zimba O, Misra DP. Scholarly publishing and journal targeting in the time of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of rheumatologists and other specialists. Rheumatol Int 2020; 40: 2023–2030, DOI: 10.1007/s00296-020-04718-x.
6.
Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. Updated December 2019. Available from: http://www.icmje.org/icmje-rec... [Accessed: 20.12.2020].
8.
Mašić I, Begić E, Donev DM, et al. Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications. Croat Med J 2016; 57: 527–529, DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2016.57.527.
9.
Zimba O, Radchenko O, Strilchuk L. Social media for research, education and practice in rheumatology. Rheumatol Int 2020; 40: 183–190, DOI: 10.1007/s00296-019-04493-4.
10.
Berenbaum F. The social (media) side to rheumatology. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2014; 10: 314–318, DOI: 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.20.
11.
Pineda C, Pérez-Neri I, Sandoval H. Challenges for social media editors in rheumatology journals: an outlook. Clin Rheumatol 2019; 38: 1785–1789, DOI: 10.1007/s10067-019-04586-2.
12.
Haldule S, Davalbhakta S, Agarwal V, et al. Post-publication promotion in rheumatology: a survey focusing on social media. Rheumatol Int 2020; 40: 1865–1872, DOI: 10.1007/s00296-020-04700-7.
13.
Lopez M, Chan TM, Thoma B, et al. The Social Media Editor at Medical Journals: Responsibilities, Goals, Barriers, and Facilitators. Acad Med 2019; 94: 701–707, DOI: 10.1097/ACM. 0000000000002496.
14.
Gasparyan AY, Zimba O, Misra DP, Kitas GD. Monitoring Information Flow on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Mediterr J Rheumatol 2020; 31(Suppl 2): 243–246, DOI: 10.31138/mjr.31.3.243.
15.
Ball P, Maxmen A. The epic battle against coronavirus misinformation and conspiracy theories. Nature 2020; 581(7809): 371–374, DOI: 10.1038/d41586-020-01452-z.
16.
Ahmed S, Gupta L. Social media for medical journals. Cent Asian J Med Hypotheses Ethics 2020; 1: 26–32, DOI: 10.47316/cajmhe.2020.1.1.04.
17.
Zachos G, Paraskevopoulou-Kollia E-A, Anagnostopoulos I. Social Media Use in Higher Education: A Review. Educ Sci 2018; 8: 194, DOI: 10.3390/educsci8040194.
18.
Cheston CC, Flickinger TE, Chisolm MS. Social media use in medical education: a systematic review. Acad Med 2013; 88: 893–901, DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828ffc23.
19.
Nikiphorou E, Studenic P, Ammitzbøll CG, et al. Social media use among young rheumatologists and basic scientists: results of an international survey by the Emerging EULAR Network (EMEUNET). Ann Rheum Dis 2017; 76: 712–715, DOI: 10.1136/ annrheumdis-2016-209718.
20.
Dedeilia A, Sotiropoulos MG, Hanrahan JG, et al. Medical and Surgical Education Challenges and Innovations in the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review. In Vivo 2020; 34 (3 Suppl): 1603–1611, DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11950.
21.
Koumpouras F, Helfgott S. Stand Together and Deliver: Challenges and Opportunities for Rheumatology Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020; 72: 1064–1066, DOI: 10.1002/art.41278.
22.
Sterling M, Leung P, Wright D, Bishop TF. The Use of Social Media in Graduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review. Acad Med 2017; 92: 1043–1056, DOI: 10.1097/ACM.000000 0000001617.
23.
Hoang JK, McCall J, Dixon AF, et al. Using Social Media to Share Your Radiology Research: How Effective Is a Blog Post? J Am Coll Radiol 2015; 12: 760–765, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.03.048.
24.
Nuzzolese AG, Ciancarini P, Gangemi A, et al. Do altmetrics work for assessing research quality? Scientometrics 2019; 118: 539–562, DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2988-z.
25.
Ortega JL. Reliability and accuracy of altmetric providers: a comparison among Altmetric.com, PlumX and Crossref Event Data. Scientometrics 2018; 116: 2123–2138, DOI: 10.1007/ s11192-018-2838-z.
26.
How is the Altmetric Attention Score calculated? Available from: https://help.altmetric.com/sup... 6000060969-how-is-the-altmetric-attention-score-calculated [Accessed: 20.12.2020].
27.
Sugimoto CR, Work S, Larivière V, Haustein S. Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 2017; 68: 2037–2062, DOI: 10.1002/asi.23833.
28.
PlumX Metrics now on Scopus: Discover how others interact with your research. Available from: https://blog.scopus.com/posts/... [Accessed: 20.12.2020].
29.
Crane GM, Gardner JM. Pathology Image-Sharing on Social Media: Recommendations for Protecting Privacy While Motivating Education. AMA J Ethics 2016; 18: 817–825, DOI: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.8.stas1-1608.
30.
Drude K, Messer-Engel K. The Development of Social Media Guidelines for Psychologists and for Regulatory Use. J Technol Behav Sci 2020; 1–9, DOI: 10.1007/s41347-020-00176-1 [Online ahead of print].
31.
Lima DL, Lopes MAAAM, Brito AM. Social media: friend or foe in the COVID-19 pandemic? Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2020; 75: e1953, DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2020/e1953.
32.
Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Voronov AA, et al. Comprehensive Approach to Open Access Publishing: Platforms and Tools. J Korean Med Sci 2019; 34: e184, DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e184.
33.
Krusche M, Burmester GR, Knitza J. Digital crowdsourcing: unleashing its power in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 79: 1139–1140, DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217697.
34.
Najm A, Kostine M, Pauling JD, et al. Multidisciplinary collaboration among young specialists: results of an international survey by the emerging EULAR network and other young organisations. RMD Open 2020; 6: e001398, DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001398.
35.
Dua AB, Kilian A, Grainger R, et al. Challenges, collaboration, and innovation in rheumatology education during the COVID-19 pandemic: leveraging new ways to teach. Clin Rheumatol 2020; 39: 3535–3541, DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-05449-x.
Copyright: © Narodowy Instytut Geriatrii, Reumatologii i Rehabilitacji w Warszawie. This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2084-9834 |
| ISSN: | 0034-6233 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
