EN PL
ORIGINAL PAPER
Assessment of the effectiveness of two different physiotherapy procedures in the conservative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome
 
More details
Hide details
 
Online publication date: 2010-09-21
 
 
Reumatologia 2010;48(4):225-229
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two different physiotherapy procedures using pulsed electromagnetic field (M) and a combined therapy consisting of laser biostimulation (L) and pulsed electromagnetic field (M) in the treatment of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Forty patients with the diagnosis of idiopathic CTS were included into the study. Clinical assessment, including pain severity rating on the VAS scale, the presence of paresthesia and functional tests, was conducted at the following stages: before treatment, after the first series, after a two-week break between series, after the second series and six months after the end of treatment. Both series of sessions were performed daily on weekdays for a period of 10 days. All patients were assigned to two groups: group I (20 patients, 33 hands) treated with M and group II (20 patients, 34 hands) treated with M and L therapy. In both groups, after the first and second series of treatment, a reduction in pain severity, the number of patients with day and night pain and with positive functional tests was observed. Six months after treatment an improvement in pain reduction and functional tests was statistically significant in the second group. Our findings confirm that both treatment procedures should be applied at least in two series, while the greatest efficacy was observed immediately after the second series. The therapeutic effect was maintained for six months after the end of treatment. The combination of L and M treatment seems to be more effective than M therapy.
 
REFERENCES (24)
1.
Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, et al. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA 1999; 282: 153-158.  .
 
2.
Armstrong T, Dale AM, Franzblau A, et al. Risk factors for carpal tunnel syndrome and median neuropathy in a working population. JOEM 2008; 12: 1355-1362.  .
 
3.
Stevens JC, Beard CM, O'Fallon WM, Kurland LT. Conditions associated with carpal tunnel syndrome. Mayo Clin Proc 1992; 67: 541-547.  .
 
4.
Muramatsu K, Tanaka H, Taguchi T. Peripheral neuropathies of the forearm and hand in rheumatoid arthritis: diagnosis and options for treatment. Rheumatol Int 2008; 28: 951-957.  .
 
5.
Raguer J, Cano LF. Carpal tunnel syndrome and hyperthyroidism: a prospective study. Acta Neurol Scand 1993; 88: 149-152.  .
 
6.
Palumbo CF, Szabo RM, Olmsted SL. The effect of hypothyroidism and thyroid replacement on the development of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg 2000; 25: 734-739.  .
 
7.
Balci K, Utku U. Carpal tunnel syndrome and metabolic syndrome. Acta Neurol Scand 2007; 116: 113-117.  .
 
8.
van Dijk MA, Reitsma JB, Fischer JC, Sanders GT. Indications for requesting laboratory tests for concurrent diseases in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review. Clin Chem 2003; 49: 1437-1444.  .
 
9.
Hupało M. Patofizjologia zespołów cieśni. Akt Neurolog 2006; 6: 242-245. .
 
10.
Whitley JM, Mc Donnel DE. Carpal tunnel syndrome. A guide to prompt intervention. Postgrad Med 1995; 1: 89-92. .
 
11.
Szczepański L. Zespół kanału nadgarstka – najczęstsza przyczyna bólu rąk. Nowa Med 1999; 96: 29-33. .
 
12.
Żyluk A, Strycharz J. Wyniki leczenia kanału nadgarstka – przegląd piśmiennictwa. Chir Narz Ruchu Ortop Pol 2005; 70: 439-445. .
 
13.
Sieroń A (red.). Magnetoterapia i laseroterapia. SAM, Katowice 1994. .
 
14.
Wentraub MI, Cole SP. A randomized controlled trial of the effects of a combination of static and dynamic magnetic fields on carpal tunnel syndrome. Pain Medicine 2008; 5: 493-504. .
 
15.
Practice parameter for carpal tunnel syndrome (summary statement). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 1993; 43: 2406-2409. .
 
16.
Bogucki A, Niedzielska K, Niewiadomska M i wsp. Rekomendacje diagnostyczne Polskiego Towarzystwa Neurofizjologii Klinicznej: elektromiografia, potencjały wywołane, elektroencefalografia. Akt Neurolog 2001; 2: 101-127. .
 
17.
Glinkowski W, Pokora L. Lasery w terapii. Wyd. Laser Instruments – Centrum Techniki Laserowej, Warszawa 1993. .
 
18.
Evcik D, Kavuncu V, Cakir T, et al. Laser therapy in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Photomed Laser Surg 2007; 25: 34-39. .
 
19.
Aigner N, Zoch G, Petje G. Laser acupuncture for preoperative pain relief in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. A prospective, randomized study. Deut Zeit Akupunktur 1999; 2: 70-75. .
 
20.
Shooshtari SM, Badiee V, Taghizadeh SH, et al. The effects of low lavel laser in clinical outcome and neurophysiological results of carpal tunnel syndrome. Elektromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2008; 48: 229-231. .
 
21.
Elwakil TF, Elazzazi A, Shokeir H. Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome by low-level laser versus open carpal tunnel release. Lasers Med Sci 2007; 22: 265-270. .
 
22.
Ginszt A, Kuliński W. Ocena zastosowania zmiennego pola magnetycznego niskiej częstotliwości w leczeniu niezaawansowanych idiopatycznych postaci zespołu kanału nadgarstka. Balneolog Pol 2002; 1-4: 57-68. .
 
23.
Weintraub MI, Cole SP. Neuromagnetic treatment of pain in refractory carpal tunnel syndrome. An electrophysiological and placebo analysis. J Back Musc Rehab 2000; 15: 77-81. .
 
24.
Weintraub MI. Pulsed magnetic field therapy in refractory carpal tunnel syndrome: Elektrodiagnostic parameters – pilot study. J Back Musc Rehab 2005; 18: 79-83.
 
Copyright: © Narodowy Instytut Geriatrii, Reumatologii i Rehabilitacji w Warszawie. This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
eISSN:2084-9834
ISSN:0034-6233
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top