ORIGINAL PAPER
Assessment of the efficacy of laser biostimulation and low-frequency pulsed magnetic field in the treatment of microvascular abnormalities in patients with Raynaud’s phenomenon
Online publication date: 2012-11-06
Reumatologia 2012;50(5):410-415
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) is characterized by a great variety of clinical patterns depending on the extent of microvasculature involvement. Nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC) represents the best non-invasive method to investigate and monitor the microcirculation disturbances. As a result of limited effects of pharmacological treatment, physical therapy gives a valuable possibility of quality of life improvement in RP patients.
Aim of the study: The aim of the study was to assess the clinical effect of the therapy using laser biostimulation and low-frequency pulsed magnetic field in 48 primary RP patients treated with pentoxifylline (Table I).
Material and methods: Clinical examination and NVC were performed before treatment, after 3 weeks of treatment with pentoxifylline and after 3 weeks of physiotherapy. After 3 weeks of pentoxifylline treatment, all patients were randomly divided into two groups, with 24 persons in each group, who additionally received 3 weeks of physiotherapy. In both groups physiotherapy was performed five days per week. In the first group, laser biostimulation was applied (frequency 1500 Hz, dose 25 J/cm2, 2.5 min duration of one session). Patients from the second group received, after laser biostimulation, low-frequency pulsed magnetic field (frequency 40 Hz, induction 1–5 mT, 10–20 min per session).
Results: After 3 weeks of the therapy with pentoxifylline the differences in number of RP episodes and their intensity did not reach statistical significance. Although after physiotherapy a significant improvement in all patients was found, no significant differences were demonstrated between the group after two types of therapy and patients who received only laser biostimulation. Furthermore, after physiotherapy an improvement of microvascular abnormalities in NVC was observed (Fig. 1–3).
Conclusions: In this study a beneficial clinical effect of laser biostimulation in RP patients treated with pentoxifylline was observed; however, low-frequency pulsed magnetic field had no additional influence on clinical improvement. Moreover, after physiotherapy an improvement of microvascular capillaroscopic abnormalities was observed.
Aim of the study: The aim of the study was to assess the clinical effect of the therapy using laser biostimulation and low-frequency pulsed magnetic field in 48 primary RP patients treated with pentoxifylline (Table I).
Material and methods: Clinical examination and NVC were performed before treatment, after 3 weeks of treatment with pentoxifylline and after 3 weeks of physiotherapy. After 3 weeks of pentoxifylline treatment, all patients were randomly divided into two groups, with 24 persons in each group, who additionally received 3 weeks of physiotherapy. In both groups physiotherapy was performed five days per week. In the first group, laser biostimulation was applied (frequency 1500 Hz, dose 25 J/cm2, 2.5 min duration of one session). Patients from the second group received, after laser biostimulation, low-frequency pulsed magnetic field (frequency 40 Hz, induction 1–5 mT, 10–20 min per session).
Results: After 3 weeks of the therapy with pentoxifylline the differences in number of RP episodes and their intensity did not reach statistical significance. Although after physiotherapy a significant improvement in all patients was found, no significant differences were demonstrated between the group after two types of therapy and patients who received only laser biostimulation. Furthermore, after physiotherapy an improvement of microvascular abnormalities in NVC was observed (Fig. 1–3).
Conclusions: In this study a beneficial clinical effect of laser biostimulation in RP patients treated with pentoxifylline was observed; however, low-frequency pulsed magnetic field had no additional influence on clinical improvement. Moreover, after physiotherapy an improvement of microvascular capillaroscopic abnormalities was observed.
REFERENCES (27)
1.
Maricq HR, Weinrich MC, Keil JE, et al. Prevalence of scleroderma spectrum disorders in the general population of South Carolina. Arthritis Rheum 1989; 32: 998-1006.
2.
Fraenkel L. Raynaud’s phenomenon: Epidemiology and risk factors. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2002; 4: 123-128. .
4.
Flavahan NA, Flavahan S, Mitra S, Chotani MA. The vasculopathy of Raynaud’s phenomenon and scleroderma. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2003; 29: 275-291.
5.
Chotani MA, Mitra S, Eid AH, et al. Distinct cAMP signaling pathways differentially regulate alpha2C-adrenoceptor expression: role in serum induction in human arteriolar smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2005; 288: H69-H76.
6.
Herrick AL, Illingworth K, Blann A, et al. Von Willebrand factor, thrombomodulin, thromboxane, thromboglobulin and markers of fibrinolysis in primary Raynaud’s phenomenon and systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1996; 55: 122-127.
7.
Cutolo M, Grassi W, Matucci-Cerinic MM. Raunaud’s phenomenon and the role of capillaroscopy. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48: 3023-3030.
8.
Meli M, Gitzelmann G, Koppensteiner R, et al. Predictive value of nailfold capillaroscopy in patients with Raynaud’s phenomenon. Clin Rheumatol 2006; 25: 153-158. .
9.
Cutolo M, Pizzorni C, Sulli A. Identification of transition from primary Raynaud’s phenomenon to secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon by nailfold videocapillaroscopy: comment on the article by Hirschl et al. [letter]. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 56: 2102-2103. .
10.
De Angelis R, Grassi W, Cutolo M. A growing need for capillaroscopy in rheumatology. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 61: 405-410.
11.
Grassi W, De Angelis R. Capillaroscopy: questions and answers. Clin Rheumatol 2007; 26: 2009-2016.
12.
Lambova SN, Müller-Ladner U. The role of capillaroscopy in differentiation of primary and secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon in rheumatic diseases: a review of the literature and two case reports. Rheumatol Int 2009; 29: 1263-1271.
13.
Nagy Z, Czirják L. Nailfold digital capillaroscopy in 447 patients with connective tissue disease and Raynaud’s disease. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2004; 18: 62-68.
14.
Kuryliszyn-Moskal A, Ciołkiewicz M, Klimiuk PA, et al. Clinical significance of nailfold capillaroscopy in systemic lupus erythematosus: correlation with endothelial cell activation markers and disease activity. Scand J Rheumatol 2009; 38: 38-45.
15.
Herrick AL, Cutolo M. Clinical implications from capillaroscopic analysis in patients with Raynaud’s phenomenon and systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum 2010; 62: 2595-2604.
16.
Cutolo M, Pizzorni C, Secchi ME, Sulli A. Capillaroscopy. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2008; 22: 1093-108.
17.
Lambova SN, Müller-Ladner U. New lines in therapy of Raynaud’s phenomenon. Rheumatol Int 2009; 28: 355-363.
18.
Kuryliszyn-Moskal A, Kita J, Dakowicz A. Ocena skuteczności impulsowego pola magnetycznego niskiej częstotliwości w leczeniu zaburzeń mikrokrążenia u pacjentów z objawem Raynauda. Acta Balneol 2011; 53: 119-123.
19.
Kita J, Kuryliszyn-Moskal A, Dakowicz A. Biostymulacja laserowa w terapii zaburzeń mikrokrążenia u pacjentów z objawem Raynauda. Postępy Nauk Med 2012; 25: 95-98.
20.
Jull A, Waters J, Arroll B. Pentoxifylline for treatment of venous leg ulcers: a systematic review. Lancet 2002; 359: 1550-1554.
21.
Sicińska J, Rudnicka L. Współczesne metody leczenia twardziny układowej. Część II. Leki wpływające na zaburzenia krążenia obwodowego i włóknienie. Pol Merk Lek 2008; 146: 196-200.
22.
Hirschl M, Katzenschlager R, Francesconi C, Kundi M. Low level laser therapy in primary Raynaud’s phenomenon – results of a placebo controlled, double blind intervention study. J Rheumatol 2004; 31: 2408-2412.
23.
Posten W, Wrone D, Dover JS, et al. Low-level laser therapy for wound healing: mechanism and efficacy. Dermatol Surg 2005; 31: 334-340.
24.
Kwolek A, Zwolińska J, Weres A. Wpływ dawki terapeutycznej na skuteczność laseroterapii nisko- i wysokoenergetycznej (HILT). Acta Bio-Optica et Informatica Medica 2011; 17: 171-178.
25.
McKay JC, Prato FS, Thomas AW. A literature review: the effects of magnetic field exposure on blood flow and blood vessels in the microvasculature. Bioelectromagnetics 2007; 28: 81-98.
26.
McNamee DA, Corbacio M, Weller JK, et al. The cardiovascular response to an acute 1800-microT, 60-Hz magnetic field exposure in humans. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2010; 83: 441-454.
27.
Cutolo M, Sulli A, Pizzorni C, Accardo S. Nailfold videocapillaroscopy assessment of microvascular damage in systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol 2000; 27: 155-160.
Copyright: © Narodowy Instytut Geriatrii, Reumatologii i Rehabilitacji w Warszawie. This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2084-9834 |
| ISSN: | 0034-6233 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
