EN PL
ORIGINAL PAPER
Comparative analysis of educational needs of patients with rheumatic diseases selected based on the Polish version of the Educational Needs Assessment Tool (Pol-ENAT)
 
More details
Hide details
 
Submission date: 2016-08-05
 
 
Final revision date: 2016-08-29
 
 
Acceptance date: 2016-08-31
 
 
Online publication date: 2016-10-05
 
 
Publication date: 2016-08-31
 
 
Reumatologia 2016;54(4):153-160
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Chronic rheumatic diseases, which have a progressive course, lead to large deficits in physical, mental and social functioning. In the process of the planned and systematic education of patients/families, it is extremely important to identify patients’ health problems as well as their needs and expectations. Study objectives: To assess the learning needs of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic sclerosis (SSc).
Material and methods: This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study conducted in seven rheumatology centers in Poland. Health problems were defined as disability (HAQ-DI), pain (Pain VAS), fatigue (Fatigue VAS) and severity of disease (0–100). The educational needs were measured using the Pol-ENAT (0–156). Statistical analysis was performed using PQStat v.1.4.2 and Excel.
Results: The study involved 277 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and 140 with systemic sclerosis. The average age of respondents was comparable in RA (53.3 ±13.0 years) and SSc (54.1 ±14.2 years). Patients suffered from RA on average for 13.7 ±10.6 years and from SSc for 10.9 ±10.3 years. With age and duration of disease, the health problems worsened (p < 0.05). The reported needs of education (Pol-ENAT) were generally at the secondary level – RA 66.4 ±29.3 – younger people (p = 0.008) and those with early RA (r = –0.151, p = 0.011); SSc 71.5 ±27.7 – regardless of age and duration of SSc. Educational needs of patients with SSc correlated with the severity of certain health problems and health evaluation (pain r = 0.334, p < 0.001; fatigue r = 0.243, p = 0.004; severity of disease r = 0.242, p = 0.004 and disability r = 0.291, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: All patients reported the need for education, although it was slightly higher in patients with SSc. There was a decline in interest in education with progressive disability in RA, while in SSc interest in education increased with the progress and severity of the disease.
 
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Sierakowska M, Lewko J, Krajewska K, et al. Jak żyć z przewlekłą chorobą reumatyczną – rola pielęgniarki w edukacji pacjentów. Problemy Pielęgniarstwa 2008; 16: 199-204.
 
2.
Van Eijk-Hustings Y, van Tubergen A, Bostrom C, et al. EULAR recommendations for the role of the nurse in the management of chronic inflammatory arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2012; 71: 13-19.
 
3.
Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. 2010 Rheumatoid Arthritis Classification Criteria An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Collaborative Initiative. Arthritis Rheum 2010; 62: 2569-2581.
 
4.
Wiland P, Maciążek-Chyra B. Stan reumatologii w Polsce w 2012 roku. Reumatologia 2012; 50: 263-275.
 
5.
van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American college of rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 72: 1747-1755.
 
6.
Ranque B, Mouthon L. Geoepidemiology of systemicsclerosis. Autoimmun Rev 2010; 9: A311-318.
 
7.
Sierakowski S, Sierakowska M. Twardzina układowa. In: Postępy reumatologii klinicznej. Zimmermann-Górska I (ed.). Wyd. Lekarskie PZWL, Warszawa 2014; 189-212.
 
8.
Sierakowska M, Klepacka M, Sierakowski S, et al. Assessment of education requirements for patients with rheumatoid arthritis, based on the Polish version of the Educational Needs Assessment Tool (Pol-ENAT), in the light of some health problems. A cross-sectional study. Ann Agric Environ Med 2016; 23: 361-367.
 
9.
Sierakowska M, Sierakowski S, Sierakowska J, et al. Adaptation and validation of the Systemic Sclerosis Quality of Life Questionnaire into polish: item analysis using rash models. Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 75 (suppl 2): 1301.
 
10.
Sierakowska M, Sierakowski S, Sierakowska S, et al. Developing the Polish Educational Needs Assessment Tool (Pol-ENAT) in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic sclerosis: a cross-cultural validation study using Rasch analysis. Qual Life Res 2014; 24: 721-733.
 
11.
Hill J, Tennant A, Adebajo A. Further development of an educational needs assessment tool (ENAT) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50: 274-275.
 
12.
Ndosi M, Tennant A, Bergsten U, et al. Cross-cultural validation of the Educational Needs Assessment Tool in RA in.
 
13.
7 European countries. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011; 12: 110.
 
14.
Ndosi M, Bremander A, Hamnes B, et al. Validation of the educational needs assessment tool as a generic instrument for rheumatic diseases in seven European countries. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 73: 2122-2129.
 
15.
Smolen JS, Landewé R, Breedveld FC, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2013 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 73: 492-509.
 
16.
Filipowicz-Sosnowka A, Rupiński R. Ocena jakości życia chorych na reumatoidalne zapalenie stawów za pomocą badań ankietowych. Reumatologia 2005; 43: 138-145.
 
17.
Neville C, Fortin PR, Fitzcharles MA, et al. The needs of patients with arthritis: the patient’s perspective. Arthritis Care Res 1999; 12: 85-95.
 
18.
Drăgoi RG, Ndosi M, Sadlonova M, et al. Patient education, disease activity and physical function: can we be more targeted? A cross sectional study among people with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and hand osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2013; 15: R156.
 
19.
Neame R, Hammond A, Dieghton C. Need for information and for involvement in decision making among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a questionnaire survey. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 53: 249-255.
 
20.
Adab P, Rankin EC, Witney AG, et al. Use of a corporate needs assessment to define the information requirements of an arthritis resource centre in Birmingham: comparison of patients’ and professionals’ views. Rheumatology 2004; 43: 1513-1518.
 
21.
Mendelson C, Poole JL. Become your own advocate: advice from women living with scleroderma. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 1492-1501.
 
22.
Meesters J, Vliet Vlieland T, Hill J, et al. Measuring educational needs among patients with rheumatoid arthritis using the Dutch version of the Educational Needs Assessment Tool (DENAT). Clin Rheumatol 2009; 28: 1073-1077.
 
23.
Van Eijk-Hustings Y, Ammerlaan J, Voorneveld-Nieuwenhuis H, et al. Patient’needs and expectations with regard to rheumatology nursing care: results of multicenter focus group interviews. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 72: 831-835.
 
24.
Newth S, Delongis A. Individual differences, mood and coping with chronic pain in rheumatoid arthritis: a daily process analysis. Psychol Health 2004; 19: 283-305.
 
25.
Wysocka-Skurska I, Sierakowska M, Sierakowski S. Ocena jakości życia pacjentów z reumatoidalnym zapaleniem stawów w zależności od stosowanej terapii farmakologicznej. Reumatologia 2012; 50: 16-23.
 
26.
Isik A, Koca SS, Ozturk A, et al. Anxiety and depression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2007; 26: 872-878.
 
27.
Godard D. The needs of patients with systemic sclerosis – what are the difficulties encountered? Autoimmun Rev 2011; 10: 291-294.
 
28.
Mäkeläinen P, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Pietilä AM. Rheumatoid arthritis patients’ education – contents and methods. J Clin Nurs 2007; 16: 258-267.
 
29.
Arvidsson S, Bergman S, Arvidsson B, et al. Effects of a self-care promoting problem-based learning programme in people with rheumatic diseases: a randomized controlled study. J Adv Nurs 2013; 69: 1500-1514.
 
30.
Samuelson UK, Ahlmèn EM. Development and evaluation of a patient education program for persons with systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Arthritis Care Res 2000; 13: 141-148.
 
Copyright: © Narodowy Instytut Geriatrii, Reumatologii i Rehabilitacji w Warszawie. This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
eISSN:2084-9834
ISSN:0034-6233
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top