EN PL
REVIEW PAPER
Leczenie złamań kości krzyżowej za pomocą cementu kostnego u pacjentów z osteoporozą
 
More details
Hide details
 
Online publication date: 2013-09-11
 
 
Reumatologia 2013;51(4):293-297
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Vertebral body fractures are most commonly observed fractures of the patients with osteoporosis. Most often are observed in the thoraco-lumbar junction and thoracic spine. It is rather seldom observed in the sacral bone. In case where sacral fracture was diagnosed in patient with osteoporosis, the available treatment procedures are similar to those used in the other vertebral compression fractures. Contemporary treatment protocol along with pharmacotherapy to slow down the bone turn-over, rehabilitation, orthotic treatment, advocates also for percutaneous injection with the bone cement of the sacral bone – sacroplasty.
Sacroplasty procedure gives chance to decrease the pain related to the fracture, limiting the immobilisation time, directly related to the bone density loss. The procedure can be performed in local anaesthesia with sedation, which is beneficial for elderly patients with co-morbidities. Contraindications for it are similar to those underlined in the rest of the spine: posterior wall fracture endangering the cement leakage to the spinal canal, neurological symptoms aggravated by the fracture occurrence, as well the general ones. In spite the sacroplasty is to be considered low risk procedures, serious complication might be observed. The most serious are cement leakage into the spinal canal or pulmonary or central nervous system embolisation with the cement. Sacroplasty, similarly to the vertebroplasty in the thoracic or lumbar spine might be a suitable procedure in osteoporotic fracture treatment of the sacrum.
 
REFERENCES (17)
1.
Burger R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, et al. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res 2007; 22: 465-475.
 
2.
Black DM, Palermo L, Nevitt MC, et al. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group Defining incident vertebral deformity: a prospective comparison of several approaches. J Bone Miner Res 1999; 14: 90-101.
 
3.
Lindsay R, Silverman SI, Cooper C, et al. Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA 2001; 285: 320-323.
 
4.
Nevitt MC, Ross PD, Palermo L, et al. Association of prevalent vertebral fracture, bone density, and alendronate treatment with incident vertebral fractures: effect of number and spinal location of fractures. Bone 1999; 25: 613-619.
 
5.
Bayley E, Srinivas S, Boszczyk BM. Clinical outcomes of sacroplasty in sacral insufficiency fractures: a review of the literature. Eur Spine J 2009; 18: 1266-1271.
 
6.
Rao RD, Singrakhia MD. Painful osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Pathogenesis, evaluation, and roles of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in its management. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A: 2010-2022.
 
7.
Garant M. Sacroplasty: a new treatment for sacral insufficiency fracture. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002; 13: 1265-1267.
 
8.
Ries T. Detection of osteoporotic sacral fractures with radionuclides. Radiology 1983; 146: 783-785.
 
9.
Schneider R, Yacovone J, Ghelman B. Unsuspected sacral fractures: detection by radionuclide bone scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985; 144: 337-341.
 
10.
Denis F, Davis S, Comfort T. Sacral fractures: an important problem. Retrospective analysis of 236 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 227: 67-81.
 
11.
Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Gagna G, et al. Transverse fracture of the upper sacrum: suicdal jumper's fracture. Spine 1985; 10: 838-845.
 
12.
Strange-Vognsen HH, Lebech A. An unusual type of fracture in the upper sacrum. J Ortho Trauma 1991; 5: 200-203.
 
13.
Frey ME, DePalme MJ, Cifu DX, et al. Percutaneous sacroplasty for osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures: a prospective, multicenter, observational pilot study. Spine J 2008; 8: 367-373.
 
14.
Gjertsen O, Schellhorn T, Nakstad PH. Fluoroscopy-guided sacroplasty: special focus on preoperative planning from three-dimensional computed tomography. Acta Radiol 2008; 49: 1042-1048.
 
15.
Lin WC, Cheng TT, Lee YC, et al. New vertebral osteoporotic compression fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty; retrospective analysis of risk factors. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19: 225-231.
 
16.
Anderson DE, Cotton JR. Mechanical analysis of percutaneous sacroplasty using CT image based finite element model. Med Eng Phys 2007; 29: 316-325.
 
17.
Belkoff SM, Molloy S. Temperature measurement during polymerization of polymethylmethacrylate cement used for vertebroplasty. Spine 2003; 28: 1555-1559.
 
Copyright: © Narodowy Instytut Geriatrii, Reumatologii i Rehabilitacji w Warszawie. This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
eISSN:2084-9834
ISSN:0034-6233
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top