EN PL
PRACA ORYGINALNA
Analiza informacji na temat reumatologii w zasobach wybranego forum internetowego w kontekście zapotrzebowania na rozwiązania z zakresu telemedycyny.
 
Więcej
Ukryj
 
Data nadesłania: 14-10-2015
 
 
Data ostatniej rewizji: 04-11-2015
 
 
Data akceptacji: 04-11-2015
 
 
Data publikacji online: 08-12-2015
 
 
Data publikacji: 31-12-2015
 
 
Reumatologia 2015;53(5):260-267
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
DZIEDZINY
STRESZCZENIE
Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine how often patients and undiagnosed people who complain of musculoskeletal system and rheumatic diseases look for knowledge contained on an Internet forum. Content analysis was used to identify the level of Internet users’ activity in the rheumatology section, compared to other areas of medicine.
Material and methods: Material included information posted on the Internet forum established at http://medyczka.pl/. The method employed was a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the content. The method was based on qualitative assessment of the first post in each thread presented on the rheumatologic subforum, by assigning keywords, subjectively determined by the researcher, to such a post. For each keyword a specific definition was established, determining a situation in which a given keyword was used.
Results: The quantitative analysis qualified rheumatology in the last place in terms of Internet users’ activity compared to other branches of medicine. The qualitative assessment of the rheumatologic forum indicated that the three most common keywords were joint pain (32), joints swelling (13), and schoolage (13). The three most common intentional keywords (arranged in order of their decreasing number) were diagnosis based on symptoms (29), interpretation of the laboratory test results (9), and how to deal with symptoms (8).
Conclusions: The analysis leads to the conclusion that the rheumatologic subforum, along with other subforums listed above, presents a critically low level of discussion. There is a large disproportion between the number of active and passive forum users, suggesting that numerous individuals search the forum for presented information. Based on the qualitative analysis of the information stocks of the rheumatologic subforum, it was established that most of the questions posted concerned young individuals, who complained of joint pain and swelling, and asked for a possible diagnosis based on the presented symptomatology, interpretation of the laboratory test results and alleviation of disease symptoms.
 
REFERENCJE (11)
1.
O’Daniel M, Rosenstein AH. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Chapter 33. Professional Communication and Team Collaboration [online] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bo... [1.09.2015].
 
2.
Rimal RN, Lapinski MK. Why health communication is important in public health Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2009; 87: 247-247. [online] doi: 10.2471/BLT.08.056713 http://www.who.int/bulletin/vo... [1.09.2015].
 
3.
Karlińska M, Masiarz P, Mężyk R. Przyspieszenie wdrażania technologii informacyjno-komunikacyjnych w regionalnej ochronie zdrowia dzięki finansowemu wsparciu UE – Przykład województwa świętokrzyskiego. [online] http://rocznikikae.sgh.waw.pl/... [1.09.2015].
 
4.
Tejera Segura B, Bustabad S. A new form of communication between rheumatology and primary care: The virtual consultation. Reumatol Clin 2015 Feb 13. pii: S1699-258X(15)00005-4. doi: 10.1016/j.reuma.2015.01.003.
 
5.
Maślińska M, Lisiewska I. Internet – instrument we współczes­nej medycynie. Od publikacji elektronicznej do leczenia i diagnostyki. In: W kierunku gospodarki elektronicznej – wyzwania, narzędzia, dobre praktyki. Upowszechnianie wiedzy w warun­kach gospodarki elektronicznej. Powichrowska B (ed.). Vol. 1, 194-199. Wyższa Szkoła Ekonomiczna w Białymstoku, Białystok 2014.
 
6.
Ostrowska S. Telemedycyna i internet medyczny – wpływ nowych środków komunikacji na relacje interesariuszy systemu ochrony zdrowia. [online] http://www.ptzp.org.pl/files/k... [1.09.2015].
 
7.
Makowska M. Analiza danych zastanych. Wydawnictwo SCHOLAR, Warszawa 2013.
 
8.
Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005; 15: 1277-1288.
 
9.
Gemius. Raport 2012. Pacjent w sieci. [online] http://pliki.gemius.pl/Raporty... [1.09.2015].
 
10.
Forum internetowe. [online] http://medyczka.pl/ [20.09.2014].
 
11.
Szpakowski R, Zając P. Analysis of the information on rheumatology in the resources of Internet services of opinion-forming dailies and weeklies. Reumatologia 2014; 52: 231-237.
 
Copyright: © Narodowy Instytut Geriatrii, Reumatologii i Rehabilitacji w Warszawie. This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
eISSN:2084-9834
ISSN:0034-6233
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top