EN PL
PRACA ORYGINALNA
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
DZIEDZINY
STRESZCZENIE
Introduction:
The aim was to examine biopsychosocial conditions of patients hospitalized in the rheumatology department of a university hospital.

Material and methods:
Ninety-six patients (mean age: 53.14 ±16.83 years) receiving inpatient treatment at the rheumatology service of a university hospital were included. Chest circumference, manual muscle testing, general well-being (Visual Analogue Scale – VAS), the Fatigue Severity Scale, the Rivermead Mobility Index, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and the Nottingham Health Profile were used for evaluation.

Results:
The average number of days hospitalized was 15.57 ±15.11. Mean disease duration was 7.91 ±9.34 years. Respiratory rate per minute was 22.55 ±6.03. Chest circumference measurement at rest was 97.01 ±9.70 cm, inspiration was 99.71 ±9.67 cm, expiration was 94.10 ±13.91 cm. Quadriceps muscle strength (on a scale of 0–5) was 4.26 ±0.74 on the right and 4.16 ±0.76 on the left; biceps brachii muscle strength was 4.46 ±0.64 on the right and 4.39 ±0.78 on the left. The VAS score was 6.03 ±2.51; the Rivermead Mobility Index was 11.41 ±4.11; the Nottingham Health Profile total score was 39.18 ±22.44; the energy level sub-score was 52.89 ±37.06. History of previous hospitalization was found in 42 patients (43.8%). Five patients (5.2%) were at bed level, 4 patients (4.2%) were at sitting level, 7 patients (7.3%) were at standing level, and 80 patients (83.3%) were at walking level. Seventeen patients (17.7%) used assistive devices for mobilization. Sixty-one patients (63.5%) were fatigued, and 21 patients (21.9%) had moderate anxiety.

Conclusions:
Inspiratory capacity of patients hospitalized in rheumatology service is low. Their respi­ratory rate is higher than the normal value. Their mobility and energy levels are at average values while fatigue and anxiety levels need to be considered. In addition to pharmacological treatments, we recommend that patients hospitalized in rheumatology service be supported by appropriate exercises provided by physiotherapists.

 
REFERENCJE (40)
1.
Vanhoof J, Declerck K, Geusens P. Prevalence of rheumatic diseases in a rheumatological outpatient practice. Ann Rheum Dis 2002; 61: 453–455, DOI: 10.1136/ard.61.5.453.
 
2.
Loza E, Abáso LO L, Jover JA, Carmona L. Burden of disease across chronic diseases: a health survey that measured prevalence, function, and quality of life. J Rheumatol 2008; 35: 6–7.
 
3.
Häuser W, Bernardy K, Arnold B, et al. Efficacy of multicomponent treatment in fibromyalgia syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 61: 216–224, DOI: 10.1002/art.24276.
 
4.
Bongi SM, Cerınıc MM. Rheumatologic rehabilitation: the great expectation for rheumatic patients. Reumatismo 2012; 16: 1–6, DOI: 10.4081/reumatismo.2012.1.
 
5.
DiMarco AF, Romaniuk JR, Supinski GS. Action of the intercostal muscles on the rib cage. Respir Physiol 1990; 82: 295–306, DOI: 10.1016/0034-5687(90)90099-k.
 
6.
Massaroni C, Nicolò A, Lo Presti D, et al. Contact-based methods for measuring respiratory rate. Sensors (Basel) 2019; 19: 908, DOI: 10.3390/s19040908.
 
7.
Medical Research Councıl. Aids to the Examination of the Peri­pheral Nervous System (Memorandum No. 45). London 1976.
 
8.
Revill SI, Robinson JO, Rosen M, Hogg MI. The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia 1976; 31: 1191–1198, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1976.tb11971.x.
 
9.
Armutlu K, Korkmaz NC, Keser I, et al. The validity and reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale in Turkish multiple sclerosis patients. Int J Rehabil Res 2007; 30: 81–85, DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3280146ec4.
 
10.
Akın B, Emıroğlu ON. The validity and reliability of Turkish version of Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) in the elderly. Turkish Journal of Geriatrics 2007; 10: 124–130.
 
11.
Ulusoy M, Sahın NH, Erkmen H. Turkish version of the beck anxiety inventory: psychometric properties. J Cognit Psychother 1996; 12: 163–172.
 
12.
Kucukdevecı AA, Mckenna SP, Kutlay S, et al. The development and psyhometric assessment of the Turkish version of the Nottingham Health Profile. Int J Rehabil Res 2000; 23: 32–38, DOI: 10.1097/00004356-200023010-00004.
 
13.
Korucu KS, Söylemez SC, Aygen O. Biopsychosocial approach and development process. Süleyman Demirel University Visio­nary Journal 2021; 12: 689–700.
 
14.
Yamada T, Steinz MM, Kenne E, Lanner JT. Muscle weakness in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of Ca2+ and free radical signaling. EBioMedicine 2017; 23: 12–19, DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.07.023.
 
15.
Holland AE, Dowman LM, Hill CJ. Principles of rehabilitation and reactivation: interstitial lung disease, sarcoidosis and rheumatoid disease with respiratory involvement. Respiration 2015; 89: 89–99, DOI: 10.1159/000370126.
 
16.
Özcan NT, Başkurt Z. Pulmonary physiotherapy in rheuma- toid arthritis. Suleyman Demirel University The Journal of Health Science 2020; 11: 266–272, DOI: 10.22312/sdusbed. 703354.
 
17.
O’Neill K, O’Donnell AE, Bradley JM. Airway clearance, mucoactive therapies and pulmonary rehabilitation in bronchiectasis. Respirology 2019; 24: 227–237, DOI: 10.1111/resp.13459.
 
18.
Suarez-Almazor ME, Kallen MA, Roundtree AK, Mayes M. Disease and symptom burden in systemic sclerosis: a patient perspective. J Rheumatol 2007; 34: 1718–1726.
 
19.
Kłak A, Raciborski F, Samel-Kowalik P. Social implications of rheumatic diseases. Reumatologia 2016; 54: 73–78, DOI: 10.5114/reum.2016.60216.
 
20.
Pak MD, Duyan V. Marital satisfaction of couples with Behcet and familial Mediterranean fever. Turk J Fam Med Prim Care 2018; 12: 239–249, DOI: 10.21763/tjfmpc.465765.
 
21.
Sharpe L, Sensky T, Allard S. The course of depression in recent onset rheumatoid arthritis: the predictive role of disability, illness perceptions, pain and coping. J Psychosom Res 2002; 51: 713–719, DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00266-5.
 
22.
Dures E, Almeida C, Caesley J, et al. Patient preferences for psychological support in inflammatory arthritis: a multi­centre survey. Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 75: 142–147, DOI: 10.1136/ annrheumdis-2014-205636.
 
23.
Druce KL, Basu N. Predictors of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 2019; 58 (Suppl 5): 29–34, DOI: 10.1093/ rheumatology/kez346.
 
24.
An HJ, Tizaoui K, Terrazzino S, et al. Sarcopenia in autoimmune and rheumatic diseases: a comprehensive review. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21: 5678, DOI: 10.3390/ijms21165678.
 
25.
Dassouki T, Benatti FB, Pınto AJ, et al. Objectively measured physical activity and its influence on physical capacity and cli­nical parameters in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Lupus 2017; 26: 690–697, DOI: 10.1177/0961203316674819.
 
26.
Miyamoto ST, Valim V, Carletti L, et al. Supervised walking improves cardiorespiratory fitness, exercise tolerance, and fatigue in women with primary Sjögren’s syndrome: a randomized- controlled trial. Rheumatol Int 2019; 39: 227–238, DOI: 10.1007/s00296-018-4213-z.
 
27.
Yentur SB, Ataş N, Ozturk MA, Oskay D. Comparison of the effectiveness of pilates exercises, aerobic exercises, and pilates with aerobic exercises in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Irish J Med Sci 2021; 190: 1027–1034, DOI: 10.1007/s11845-020-02412-2.
 
28.
Tokul AI, Bayram GA. The analysis of the biopsychosocial characteristics of the individuals doing pilates and the sedentary individuals in COVID-19 pandemic period. World Women Studies J 2023; 8: 17–26.
 
29.
Cramp F. The role of non-pharmacological interventions in the management of rheumatoid arthritis-related fatigue. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019; 58 (Suppl 5): v22–v28, DOI: 10.1093/ rheumatology/kez310.
 
30.
Tench C, Mccarthy J, Mccurdie I, et al. Fatigue in systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomized controlled trial of exercise. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003; 42: 1050–1054, DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg289.
 
31.
De Cock D, Doumen M, Vervloesem C, et al. Psychological stress in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic scoping review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2022; 55: 152014, DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit. 2022.152014.
 
32.
Ng KJ, Huang KY, Tung CH, et al. Risk factors, including different biologics, associated with depression and anxiety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional observational study. Clin Rheumatol 2020; 39: 737–746, DOI: 10.1007/s10067-019-04820-x.
 
33.
Nash P. EULAR RA management recommendations, efficacy and safety systematic literature reviews. Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 79: 679–680, DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216821.
 
34.
Oksüz S, Unal E, Goktug ER, Malkoc M. Investigation of correlation of biyopsychosocial characteristics in individuals with ankylosing spondylitis living in Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus: a pilot study. J Exerc Ther Rehabil 2017; 4: 9–17.
 
35.
Bize R, Johnson J, Plotnıkoff RC. Physical activity level and health-related quality of life in the general adult population: a systematic review. Prev Med 2007; 45: 401–415, DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.017.
 
36.
Ferwerda M, Van Beugen S, Van Middendorp H, et al. A tailored- guided internet-based cognitive-behavioral intervention for patients with rheumatoid arthritis as an adjunct to standard rheumatological care: results of a randomized controlled trial. Pain 2017; 158: 868–878, DOI: 10.1097/j.pain. 0000000000000845.
 
37.
Bundy C, Pinder B, Bucci S, et al. A novel, web-based, psychological intervention for people with psoriasis: the electronic Targeted Intervention for Psoriasis (eTIPs) study. Br J Dermatol 2013; 169: 329–336, DOİ: 10.1111/bjd.12350.
 
38.
Caglayan BC, Calik BB, Kabul EG, Karasu U. Investigation of effectiveness of reformer pilates in individuals with fibromyalgia: a randomized controlled trial. Reumatol Clin (Engl Ed) 2023; 19: 18–25, DOI: 10.1016/j.reumae.2022.01.003.
 
39.
Preece JC, Sandberg JG. Family resilien­ce and the management of fibromyalgia: Implica­tions for family therapists. Contemp Fam Ther 2005; 27: 559–576.
 
40.
Golden BA, Barbera LS. Biopsychoso­cial treatment of pain. In: Freeman A, Felgoise SH, Nezu CM, et al. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Cognitive Behavior Therapy. Springer, Boston 2005; p. 74–76.
 
Copyright: © Narodowy Instytut Geriatrii, Reumatologii i Rehabilitacji w Warszawie. This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
eISSN:2084-9834
ISSN:0034-6233
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top