ORIGINAL PAPER
Etanercept in a therapeutic program for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis – 7 years’ personal experience
More details
Hide details
Online publication date: 2013-03-05
Reumatologia 2013;51(1):15-19
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Aim of the study: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of etanercept (ETA) treatment in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) enrolled in the national therapeutic program.
Material and methods: The study was conducted in 55 adult patients with active RA (DAS28 > 5.8) and 33 adult patients with active AS (BASDAI > 7) who were enrolled in the ETA national therapeutic program as a first (40 RA patients) or second (15 RA patients) line biological therapy. The period of observation of RA patients lasted from 3 months to 9 years, whereas in AS patients it lasted from 1 to 30 months. The safety; rate of long-term remissions and primary or secondary ineffectiveness of ETA treatment were analyzed.
Results: Permanent remission (over 12 months without biological therapy) occurred in a similar percentage of RA patients (5–9%) and AS patients (3–9%). There were 7 non-responders (12.7%) to the initial treatment with ETA in a group of RA patients and 3 (9%) in AS patients (NS). Secondary ineffectiveness of ETA therapy was observed in 19 (34.5%) RA patients and in 2 (6.1%) AS patients. Side effects (infections and allergic skin reactions) were relatively rare, mainly at the beginning of therapy.
Conclusions: We conclude that ETA treatment is a safe and effective form of therapy in patients with active, long-term RA previously treated with various DMARDs, and in patients with active form of AS. Primary ineffectiveness of ETA therapy is relatively rare in RA and AS patients. On the other hand, the secondary ineffectiveness of therapy in RA patients is the reason for its discontinuation in about one-third of patients after ca. 28 months of treatment.
REFERENCES (18)
1.
Kucharz E. Etanercept – budowa, farmakologia, farmakokinetyka, interakcje. W: Enbrel – zastosowanie kliniczne. Wiland P (red.). Wydawnictwo Medyczne Górnicki, Wrocław 2012; 17-21.
2.
Zhou H. Clinical pharmacokinetics of etanercept: a fully humanized soluble recombinant tumor necrosis receptor fusion protein. J Clin Pharmacol 2005; 45: 490-497.
3.
Dhillon S, Lyseng-Williamson KA, Scott LJ. Etanercept: a review of its use in the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Drugs 2007; 67: 1211-1241.
4.
Charakterystyka produktu leczniczego (ChPL) Enbrel, 2010.
5.
Śliwczyński A, Kruszewski R, Binkowski J i wsp. Finansowanie leczenia lekami biologicznymi chorych na reumatoidalne i młodzieńcze idiopatyczne zapalenie stawów w ramach programów zdrowotnych NFZ w latach 2004–2008. Reumatologia 2010; 48: 14-24.
6.
Wiland P, Maciążek-Chyra B. Stan reumatologii w Polsce w 2012 roku. Reumatologia 2012; 50: 263-275.
7.
Programy lekowe. Obwieszczenie Ministra Zdrowia z dnia 28 czerwca 2012 r. w sprawie wykazu refundowanych leków, środków spożywczych specjalnego przeznaczenia żywieniowego oraz wyrobów medycznych na dzień 1 lipca 2012 r. (załączniki: B.33, B.35, B.36).
8.
Emery P, Breedveld F, van der Heijde D, et al. Two-year clinical and radiographic results with combination etanercept-methotrexate therapy versus monotherapy in early rheumatoid arthritis a two-year, double-blind, randomized study. Arthritis Rheum 2010; 62: 674-682.
9.
Anis A, Zhang W, Emery P, et al. The effect of etanercept on work productivity in patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis: results from the COMET study. Rheumatology 2009; 48: 1283-1289.
10.
Braun J, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE, Huang F, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of etanercept versus sulfasalazine in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 2011; 63: 1543-1551.
11.
Pavelka K, Forejtová S, Stolfa J, et al. Anti-TNF therapy of ankylosing spondylitis in clinical practice. Results from the Czech national registry ATTRA. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2009; 27: 958-963.
12.
Pavelka K, Fojtiková M, Hejduk K. Efficacy of the first and subsequent courses of anti-TNF therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis – results from the Czech national Register ATTRA. Reumatologia 2012; 50: 294-306.
13.
Elkayam O, Pavelka K. Biologic registries in rheumatology: lessons learned and expectations for the future. Autoimmun Rev 2012; 12: 329-336.
14.
Żuber Z, Rutkowska-Sak, Postępski J, et al. Etanercept treatment in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: the Polish registry. Med Sci Monit 2011; 7: SR35-SR42.
15.
Raciborski F, Nyczaj K, Głuszko P i wsp. Rejestry medyczne w reumatologii: czy w Polsce potrzebny jest rejestr reumatologiczny? Reumatologia 2012; 50: 416-424.
16.
Smolen JS, Landewé R, Breedveld FC, et al. EULAR recommendations for management of rheumatoid arthritis with syntetic and biological diseases-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Ann Rheum Dis 2010; 69: 964-975.
17.
Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Bijlsma JW, et al. Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis 2010; 69: 631-637.
18.
Singh JA, Furst DE, Bharat A, et al. 2012 update of the 2008 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012; 64: 625-639.
Copyright: © Narodowy Instytut Geriatrii, Reumatologii i Rehabilitacji w Warszawie. This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.