Bieżący numer
Archiwum
Online first
O czasopiśmie
Redakcja
Rada Naukowa
Wydawca
Standardy etyczne i procedury
Bazy indeksacyjne
Recenzenci
Recenzenci Honorowi
Prenumerata
Kontakt
Najczęściej czytane artykuły
Dla autorów
Opłata za przetwarzanie artykułu (APC)
Książki i Konferencje
Książki
Konferencje
SARS CoV-2/COVID-19
ARTYKUŁ REDAKCYJNY
Plagiarism detection and prevention: a primer for researchers
1
Department of Internal Medicine No. 2, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine
2
Departments of Rheumatology and Research and Development, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust (Teaching Trust of the University of Birmingham, UK), Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, West Midlands, UK
Data nadesłania: 09-02-2021
Data akceptacji: 21-02-2021
Data publikacji online: 13-05-2021
Data publikacji: 16-07-2021
Reumatologia 2021;59(3):132-137
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
DZIEDZINY
STRESZCZENIE
Plagiarism is an ethical misconduct affecting the quality, readability, and trustworthiness of scholarly publications. Improving researcher awareness of plagiarism of words, ideas, and graphics is essential for avoiding unacceptable writing practices. Global editorial associations have publicized their statements on strategies to clean literature from redundant, stolen, and misleading information. Consulting related documents is advisable for upgrading author instructions and warning plagiarists of academic and other consequences of the unethical conduct. A lack of creative thinking and poor academic English skills are believed to compound most instances of redundant and “copy-and-paste” writing. Plagiarism detection software largely relies on reporting text similarities. However, manual checks are required to reveal inappropriate referencing, copyright violations, and substandard English writing.
Medical researchers and authors may improve their writing skills and avoid the same errors by consulting the list of retractions due to plagiarism which are tracked on the PubMed platform and discussed on the Retraction Watch blog.
Medical researchers and authors may improve their writing skills and avoid the same errors by consulting the list of retractions due to plagiarism which are tracked on the PubMed platform and discussed on the Retraction Watch blog.
REFERENCJE (57)
1.
Bouville M. Plagiarism: words and ideas. Sci Eng Ethics 2008; 14: 311–322, DOI: 10.1007/s11948-008-9057-6.
2.
de Vasconcelos SM, Roig M. Prior Publication and Redundancy in Contemporary Science: Are Authors and Editors at the Crossroads? Sci Eng Ethics 2015; 21: 1367–1378, DOI: 10.1007/s11948-014-9599-8.
3.
Roig M. Avoiding unethical writing practices. Food Chem Toxicol 2012; 50: 3385–3387, DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.06.043.
4.
Wang T, Xing QR, Wang H, Chen W. Retracted Publications in the Biomedical Literature from Open Access Journals. Sci Eng Ethics 2019; 25: 855–868, DOI: 10.1007/s11948-018-0040-6.
5.
Heaven D. AI peer reviewers unleashed to ease publishing grind. Nature 2018; 563: 609–610, DOI: 10.1038/d41586-018-07245-9.
6.
Mehregan M. Ethical Reviewers are Essential for Scholarly Journals for Timely Processing of Submissions and Avoiding Retractions. J Korean Med Sci 2019; 34: e41, DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e41.
7.
Yi N, Nemery B, Dierickx K. Perceptions of plagiarism by biomedical researchers: an online survey in Europe and China. BMC Med Ethics 2020; 21: 44, DOI: 10.1186/s12910-020-00473-7.
9.
Misra DP, Agarwal V. Integrity of clinical research conduct, reporting, publishing, and post-publication promotion in rheumatology. Clin Rheumatol 2020; 39: 1049–1060, DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-04965-0.
10.
CSE’s White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications. Available from: https://www.councilscienceedit... [Accessed: 27.01.2021].
11.
Recommendations on Publication Ethics Policies for Medical Journals. Available from: https://wame.org/recommendatio... [Accessed: 27.01.2021].
12.
Gasparyan AY, Nurmashev B, Seksenbayev B, et al. Plagiarism in the Context of Education and Evolving Detection Strategies. J Korean Med Sci 2017; 32: 1220–1227, DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.8.1220.
13.
Sun X, Hu G. What do academics know and do about plagiarism? An interview study with Chinese university teachers of English. Ethics Behav 2020; 30: 459–479, DOI: 10.1080/10508422.2019.1633922.
14.
Masters K. Ethics in medical education digital scholarship: AMEE Guide No. 134. Med Teach 2020; 42: 252–265, DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1695043.
15.
Coughlin PE. Plagiarism in five universities in Mozambique: Magnitude, detection techniques, and control measures. Int J Educ Integr 2015; 11: 2, DOI: 10.1007/s40979-015-0003-5.
16.
Johnson DR, Ecklund EH. Ethical Ambiguity in Science. Sci Eng Ethics 2016; 22: 989–1005, DOI: 10.1007/s11948-015-9682-9.
17.
Mahmud S, Bretag T, Foltýnek T. Students’ Perceptions of Plagiarism Policy in Higher Education: a Comparison of the United Kingdom, Czechia, Poland and Romania. J Acad Ethics 2019; 17: 271–289, DOI: 10.1007/s10805-018-9319-0.
18.
Javaeed A, Khan AS, Khan SH, Ghauri SK. Perceptions of plagiarism among undergraduate medical students in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci 2019; 35: 532–536, DOI: 10.12669/pjms.35.2.33.
19.
Rokni MB, Bizhani N, Habibzadeh F, et al. Comprehensive Survey of Plagiarism in Iran. Pak J Med Sci 2020; 36: 1441–1448, DOI: 10.12669/pjms.36.7.3456.
20.
Sharma H, Verma S. Insight into modern-day plagiarism: The science of pseudo research. Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi 2019; 32: 240–244, DOI: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_210_19.
21.
Das N. Intentional or unintentional, it is never alright to plagiarize: A note on how Indian universities are advised to handle plagiarism. Perspect Clin Res 2018; 9: 56–57, DOI: 10.4103/picr.PICR_140_17.
22.
Roig M. Encouraging Editorial Flexibility in Cases of Textual Reuse. J Korean Med Sci 2017; 32: 557–560, DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.4.557.
23.
Vessal K, Habibzadeh F. Rules of the game of scientific writing: fair play and plagiarism. Lancet 2007; 369: 641, DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60307-9.
24.
Ahmed S, Anirvan P. The true meaning of plagiarism. Indian J Rheumatol 2020; 15: 155–158, DOI: 10.4103/injr.injr_178_20.
25.
Roostaee M, Fakhrahmad SM, Sadreddini MH. Cross-language text alignment: A proposed two-level matching scheme for plagiarism detection. Expert Syst Appl 2020; 160: 113718, DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113718.
26.
Memon AR. Similarity and Plagiarism in Scholarly Journal Submissions: Bringing Clarity to the Concept for Authors, Reviewers and Editors. J Korean Med Sci 2020; 35: e217, DOI: 10.3346/ jkms.2020.35.e217.
27.
Baydik OD, Gasparyan AY. How to Act When Research Misconduct Is Not Detected by Software but Revealed by the Author of the Plagiarized Article. J Korean Med Sci 2016; 31: 1508–1510, DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.10.1508.
28.
Hong ST. Plagiarism Continues to Affect Scholarly Journals. J Korean Med Sci 2017; 32: 183–185, DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2017. 32.2.183.
29.
Zhang XX, Huo ZL, Zhang YH. Detecting and (not) dealing with plagiarism in an engineering paper: beyond CrossCheck – a case study. Sci Eng Ethics 2014; 20: 433–443, DOI: 10.1007/s11948-013-9460-5.
30.
Misra DP, Ravindran V. Publication misconducts related to copyright: tread carefully to avoid falling. J R Coll Physicians Edinb 2020; 50: 3–5, DOI: 10.4997/JRCPE.2020.101.
31.
Kravitz RL, Feldman MD. From the Editors’ Desk: Self-Plagiarism and Other Editorial Crimes and Misdemeanors. J Gen Intern Med 2011; 26: 1, DOI: 10.1007/s11606-010-1562-z.
32.
Park S, Yang SH, Jung E, et al. Similarity Analysis of Korean Medical Literature and Its Association with Efforts to Improve Research and Publication Ethics. J Korean Med Sci 2017; 32: 887–892, DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.6.887.
33.
Foltýnek T, Dlabolová D, Anohina-Naumeca A, et al. Testing of support tools for plagiarism detection. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 2020; 17: 46, DOI: 10.1186/s41239-020-00192-4.
34.
Owens JK, Nicoll LH. Plagiarism in Predatory Publications: A Comparative Study of Three Nursing Journals. J Nurs Scholarsh 2019; 51: 356–363, DOI: 10.1111/jnu.12475.
35.
Paltridge B. Writing for Academic Journals in the Digital Era. RELC J 2020; 51: 147–157, DOI: 10.1177/0033688219890359.
36.
Magulod GC, Capulso LB, Tabiolo CDL, et al. Use of technology- based tools in ensuring quality of publishable journal articles. Int J Learn Teach Educ Res 2020; 19: 145–162.
37.
Memon AR, Mavrinac M. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Plagiarism as Reported by Participants Completing the Author AID MOOC on Research Writing. Sci Eng Ethics 2020; 26: 1067–1088, DOI: 10.1007/s11948-020-00198-1.
38.
Sun YC. Do journal authors plagiarize? Using plagiarism detection software to uncover matching text across disciplines J Engl Acad Purp 2013; 12: 264–272, DOI: 10.1016/jeap. 2013.07.002.
39.
Baskaran S, Agarwal A, Panner Selvam MK, et al. Is there plagiarism in the most influential publications in the field of andrology? Andrologia 2019; 51: e13405, DOI: 10.1111/and.13405.
40.
Li Y. Text-based plagiarism in scientific publishing: issues, developments and education. Sci Eng Ethics 2013; 19: 1241–1254, DOI: 10.1007/s11948-012-9367-6.
41.
Taylor DB. Plagiarism in Manuscripts Submitted to the AJR: Development of an Optimal Screening Algorithm and Management Pathways. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017; 208: 712–720, DOI: 10.2214/AJR.17.18078.
42.
Miller BJ. Similarity scores are not all the same. J Psychiatr Res 2020; 131: 31–32.
43.
El-Tahan MR. Can the similarity index predict the causes of retractions in high-impact anesthesia journals? A bibliometric analysis. Saudi J Anaesth 2019; 13 (Suppl 1): S2–S8, DOI: 10.4103/sja.SJA_709_18.
44.
Weber-Wulff D. Plagiarism detectors are a crutch, and a problem. Nature 2019; 567: 435, DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-00893-5.
45.
Shen H. Meet this super-spotter of duplicated images in science papers. Nature 2020; 581: 132–136, DOI: 10.1038/d41586-020-01363-z.
46.
Eisa TAE, Salim N, Abdelmaboud A. Content-based scientific figure plagiarism detection using semantic mapping. In: Saeed F, Mohammed F, Gazem N (eds.). Emerging Trends in Intelligent Computing and Informatics. IRICT 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 2020; 1073: 420–427. Springer, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
47.
Thakur R, Rohilla R. Recent advances in digital image manipulation detection techniques: A brief review. Forensic Sci Int 2020; 312: 110311, DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110311.
48.
Akshay S, Chaitanya BN, Kumar R. Image plagiarism detection using compressed images. IJITEE 2019; 8: 1423–1426.
49.
Kaliyadan F. Image manipulation and image plagiarism – what’s fine and what’s not? Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2017; 83: 519–521, DOI: 10.4103/ijdvl.IJDVL_521_17.
50.
Cassão BD, Herbella FAM, Schlottmann F, Patti MG. Retracted articles in surgery journals. What are surgeons doing wrong? Surgery 2018; 163: 1201–1206, DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.01.015.
51.
Ayodele FO, Yao L, Haron H. Promoting Ethics and Integrity in Management Academic Research: Retraction Initiative. Sci Eng Ethics 2019; 25: 357–382, DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9941-z.
52.
Kamali N, Talebi Bezmin Abadi A, Rahimi F. Plagiarism, Fake Peer-Review, and Duplication: Predominant Reasons Underlying Retractions of Iran-Affiliated Scientific Papers. Sci Eng Ethics 2020; 26: 3455–3463, DOI: 10.1007/s11948-020-00274-6.
53.
Rossouw TM, Matsau L, van Zyl C. An Analysis of Retracted Articles with Authors or Co-authors from the African Region: Possible Implications for Training and Awareness Raising. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2020; 15: 478–493, DOI: 10.1177/1556264620955110.
54.
Deculllier E, Maisonneuve H. Correcting the literature: Improvement trends seen in contents of retraction notices. BMC Res Notes 2018; 11: 490, DOI: 10.1186/s13104-018-3576-2.
55.
Chambers LM, Michener CM, Falcone T. Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology. BJOG 2019; 126: 1134–1140, DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15813.
56.
Kardeş S, Levack W, Özkuk K, et al. Retractions in Rehabilitation and Sport Sciences Journals: A Systematic Review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2020; 101: 1980–1990, DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr. 2020.03.010.
57.
Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Akazhanov NA, Kitas GD. Self-correction in biomedical publications and the scientific impact. Croat Med J 2014; 55: 61–72, DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2014.55.61.
Copyright: © Narodowy Instytut Geriatrii, Reumatologii i Rehabilitacji w Warszawie. This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Udostępnij
ARTYKUŁ POWIĄZANY
| eISSN: | 2084-9834 |
| ISSN: | 0034-6233 |
Przetwarzamy dane osobowe zbierane podczas odwiedzania serwisu. Realizacja funkcji pozyskiwania informacji o użytkownikach i ich zachowaniu odbywa się poprzez dobrowolnie wprowadzone w formularzach informacje oraz zapisywanie w urządzeniach końcowych plików cookies (tzw. ciasteczka). Dane, w tym pliki cookies, wykorzystywane są w celu realizacji usług, zapewnienia wygodnego korzystania ze strony oraz w celu monitorowania ruchu zgodnie z Polityką prywatności. Dane są także zbierane i przetwarzane przez narzędzie Google Analytics (więcej).
Możesz zmienić ustawienia cookies w swojej przeglądarce. Ograniczenie stosowania plików cookies w konfiguracji przeglądarki może wpłynąć na niektóre funkcjonalności dostępne na stronie.
Możesz zmienić ustawienia cookies w swojej przeglądarce. Ograniczenie stosowania plików cookies w konfiguracji przeglądarki może wpłynąć na niektóre funkcjonalności dostępne na stronie.
