Leczenie tocznia rumieniowatego układowego. Część I. Zalecenia  leczenia tocznia rumieniowatego układowego

W artykule przedstawiono zalecenia leczenia różnych postaci tocznia rumieniowatego układowego oparte na aktualnych rekomendacjach Europejskiego i Amerykańskiego Towarzystwa Reumatologicznego oraz na wynikach dostępnych badań klinicznych.

REFERENCJE (33)

McCune WJ, Cagnoli PC, Gonzalez-Rivera T. Treatment of non-renal lupus. In: Rheumatology. 5th edition. Hochberg MC (ed.). Mosby Elsevier, Philadelphia 2011; 1307-1316.

Google Scholar

Bertsias G, Ioannidis JP, Boletis J, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus. Report of a Task Force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics. Ann Rheum Dis 2008; 67: 195-205.

Google Scholar

Costedoat-Chalumeau N, Amoura Z, Hulot JS, et al. Hydroxychloroquine in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lancet 2007; 369: 1257-1258.

Google Scholar

Tsokos GC, Gordon C, Smolen JS. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Mosby Elsevier, Philadeplphia 2007.

Google Scholar

Bertsias GK, Tektonidou M, Amoura Z, et al. Joint European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of adult and paediatric lupus nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2012; 71: 1771-1782.

Google Scholar

Hahn BH, McMahon MA, Wilkinson A, et al. American College of Rheumatology guidelines for screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012; 64: 797-808.

Google Scholar

Kasitanon N, Fine DM, Haas M, et al. Hydroxychloroquine use predicts complete renal remission within 12 months among patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil therapy for membranous lupus nephritis. Lupus 2006; 15: 366-370.

Google Scholar

Fessler BJ, Alarcón GS, McGwin G Jr, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus in three ethnic groups: XVI. Association of hydroxychloroquine use with reduced risk of damage accrual. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 52: 1473-1480.

Google Scholar

Tsakonas E, Joseph L, Esdaile JM, et al. A long-term study of hydroxychloroquine withdrawal on exacerbations in systemic lupus erythematosus. The Canadian Hydroxychloroquine Study Group. Lupus 1998; 7: 80-85.

Google Scholar

10.

Alarcón GS, McGwin G, Bertoli AM, et al.; LUMINA Study Group. Effect of hydroxychloroquine on the survival of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: data from LUMINA, a multiethnic US cohort (LUMINA L). Ann Rheum Dis 2007; 66: 1168-1172.

Google Scholar

11.

Navarra SV, Guzmán RM, Gallacher AE, et al.; BLISS-52 Study Group. Efficacy and safety of belimumab in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2011; 377: 721-731.

Google Scholar

12.

Furie R, Petri M, Zamani O, et al.; BLISS-76 Study Group. A phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled study of belimumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits B lymphocyte stimulator, in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2011; 63: 3918-3930.

Google Scholar

13.

Sanna G, Bertolaccini ML, Mathieu A. Central nervous system lupus: a clinical approach to therapy. Lupus 2003; 12: 935-942.

Google Scholar

14.

Bertsias GK, Ioannidis JP, Aringer M, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus with neuropsychiatric manifestations: report of a task force of the EULAR standing committee for clinical affairs. Ann Rheum Dis 2010; 69: 2074-2082.

Google Scholar

15.

Barile-Fabris L, Ariza-Andraca R, Olguín-Ortega L, et al. Controlled clinical trial of IV cyclophosphamide versus IV methylprednisolone in severe neurological manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 620-625.

Google Scholar

16.

Ginzler EM, Dooley MA, Aranow C, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil or intravenous cyclophosphamide for lupus nephritis. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 2219-2228.

Google Scholar

17.

Houssiau FA, Vasconcelos C, D'Cruz D, et al. The 10-year follow-up data of the Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial comparing low-dose and high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide. Ann Rheum Dis 2010; 69: 61-64.

Google Scholar

18.

Houssiau FA, Vasconcelos C, D'Cruz D, et al. Immunosuppressive therapy in lupus nephritis: the Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial, a randomized trial of low-dose versus high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46: 2121-2131.

Google Scholar

19.

Appel GB, Contreras G, Dooley MA, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide for induction treatment of lupus nephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 20: 1103-1112.

Google Scholar

20.

Dooley MA, Hogan S, Jennette C, Falk R. Cyclophosphamide therapy for lupus nephritis: poor renal survival in black Americans. Glomerular Disease Collaborative Network. Kidney Int 1997; 51: 1188-1195.

Google Scholar

21.

Isenberg D, Appel GB, Contreras G, et al. Influence of race/ethnicity on response to lupus nephritis treatment: the ALMS study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010; 49: 128-140.

Google Scholar

22.

Arends S, Grootscholten C, Derksen RH, et al.; Dutch Working Party on systemic lupus erythematosus. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of azathioprine/methylprednisolone versus cyclophosphamide in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2012; 71: 966-973.

Google Scholar

23.

Grootscholten C, Ligtenberg G, Hagen EC, et al. Azathioprine/methylprednisolone versus cyclophosphamide in proliferative lupus nephritis. A randomized controlled trial. Kidney Int 2006; 70: 732-742.

Google Scholar

24.

Radhakrishnan J, Moutzouris DA, Ginzler EM, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil and intravenous cyclophosphamide are similar as induction therapy for class V lupus nephritis. Kidney Int 2010; 77: 152-160.

Google Scholar

25.

Austin HA 3rd, Illei GG, Braun MJ, Balow JE. Randomized, controlled trial of prednisone, cyclophosphamide, and cyclosporine in lupus membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 20: 901-911.

Google Scholar

26.

Dooley MA, Jayne D, Ginzler EM, et al.; ALMS Group. Mycophenolate versus azathioprine as maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 1886-1895.

Google Scholar

27.

Houssiau FA, D'Cruz D, Sangle S, et al. Azathioprine versus mycophenolate mofetil for long-term immunosuppression in lupus nephritis: results from the MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2010; 69: 2083-2089.

Google Scholar

28.

Illei GG, Austin HA, Crane M, et al. Combination therapy with pulse cyclophosphamide plus pulse methylprednisolone improves long-term renal outcome without adding toxicity in patients with lupus nephritis. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135: 248-257.

Google Scholar

29.

Boumpas DT, Austin HA 3rd, Vaughn EM, et al. Controlled trial of pulse methylprednisolone versus two regimens of pulse cyclophosphamide in severe lupus nephritis. Lancet 1992; 340: 741-745.

Google Scholar

30.

Gourley MF, Austin HA 3rd, Scott D, et al. Methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide, alone or in combination, in patients with lupus nephritis. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1996; 125: 549-557.

Google Scholar

31.

Jónsdóttir T, Gunnarsson I, Mourão AF, et al. Clinical improvements in proliferative vs membranous lupus nephritis following B-cell depletion: pooled data from two cohorts. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010; 49: 1502-1504.

Google Scholar

32.

Díaz-Lagares C, Croca S, Sangle S, et al. Efficacy of rituximab in 164 patients with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis: pooled data from European cohorts. Autoimmun Rev 2012; 11: 357-364.

Google Scholar

33.

Ramos-Casals M, Diaz-Lagares C, Soto-Cardenas MJ, et al. Rituximab therapy in lupus nephritis: current clinical evidence. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2011; 40: 159-169.

Google Scholar

Copyright: © Narodowy Instytut Geriatrii, Reumatologii i Rehabilitacji w Warszawie. This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.

Wyślij swój artykuł

Archiwum

Dla autorów

Udostępnij

Wyślij mailem

ARTYKUŁ POWIĄZANY

Artykuł oryginalny/Original paper
Wkład Instytutu Reumatologii w rozwój badań nad toczniem rumieniowatym układowym w latach 1963–2002

ARTYKUŁ PRZEGLĄDOWY
Przeciwciała przeciwko rybosomalnemu białku P – znaczenie kliniczne i udział w patogenezie tocznia rumieniowatego układowego

ARTYKUŁ PRZEGLĄDOWY/REVIEW PAPER
Zajęcie układu krążenia u chorych na toczeń rumieniowaty układowy – przegląd literatury i własne obserwacje. Serologiczne czynniki ryzyka powikłań kardiologicznych

ARTYKUŁ PRZEGLĄDOWY/REVIEW PAPER
Ocena przydatności różnych przeciwciał antyfosfolipidowych w diagnostyce wtórnego zespołu antyfosfolipidowego w przebiegu tocznia rumieniowatego układowego – przegląd literatury i obserwacje własne

Opis przypadku
Cyklosporyna A w leczeniu choroby Stilla

Indeksy